NASA weather models for your children

Posted by Willard Anderson on April 14th, 2015.

NASA inputted its weather data, and all 17 climate models agreed on outcomes 35 yrs ahead. This is your childrens’ and grand childrens’ life to come. If you care about the children best to take a look on line.

NASA Earth Observation Megadrought

Harper’s Policies will harm children – if you care act on climate

Posted by Willard Anderson on April 11th, 2015.

“PARLIAMENT CAN HARDLY BE WEAKENED ANY MORE THAN IT ALREADY IS. HARPER CAN’T GO MUCH FURTHER WITHOUT MAKING THE INSTITUTION DYSFUNCTIONAL. HE IS TRYING TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF HOUSE BUSINESS. IN FACT, IT WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED TO ITS FORMER STATE BY SOMEONE IF WE ARE TO HAVE A DEMOCRACY.” (HARRIS, One Man Party .P. 431.) Between loss of our democracy and climate warming government is very destructive. THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. We need to : 1. Know the difference between fact, belief and opinion and look to what are our probable heated futures. 2. Know that we depend totally upon the normal physical, biological and ecological natural laws that influence earth and we are victim of negative human influence. 3. Know that freedom of speech and democracy were once founding government precepts.
4. Know that when CSIS has more power the public has less freedom. Harper has given CSIS more power and implies that if peaceful demonstrators interfere with the fossil fuel industry which through climate warming is globally killing four million people a year (more than one million children), he will impose the full strength of the law and constrain one with out right of trial. 5. Know that the significance of computers is multiplying the speed of research and invention but also that they are only one of the macro influences upon earth. 6. Know that biological sciences have lagged. the human body was studied but the fundamental importance of biology in terms of the total earth populations and ecosystem sustainability was dismissed. It interfered with the business model. Harper sees no need for full understanding of the bio-physical laws of the earth since it does not apply to a theoretical belief system such as religions. 7. Know that carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released through burning fossil fules in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming and climate disasters. We recognized fossil fuel caused CO2 build up by 1900 and had better measures by 1957. CO2 emissions targets a decade or two ago was 350 ppm in order to maintain a liveable climate. We are now over 400 ppm! We need a change back to what the 1700 CO2 concentrations were and those targets need to be met in a decade. We can do it as we mobilized for the second world war in one year. Harper has turned on the extinction time bomb. We have little time to reverse climate warming. 8.Know there must be national and global action by the UN to implement serious jail penalties for: oil companies not implementing the pumping out of CO2 from the atmosphere and for not paying for oil to green energy replacement. They need to phase in closure of fossil fuel drilling, fracking and pumping. All wells must be tested for leakage and maintained and now methane releases in the high arctic require close monitoring. These are fossil fuel company costs. We must reward companies that recover CO2 from the atmosphere and produce mostly green energy 9. Know that the death rates from fossil fuels and success on these above endeavors must be posted on every big cities Times Square and posted on the net as well as noted on absolutely every weather forecast.
This is the new normal. Without it we die. The facts are in. Some deniers or religions may refute this but they are ignorant or may be Satanists. We should rapidly come to know them, and prosecute hate propaganda and those that deny climate warming. (The War on Science, March 2015)

B. THE DISHONORABLE MAN
The Canadian parliamentary system is adapted from English systems and traditions. Diefenbaker said: it was important to honor the precepts of the democratic system. Today we have: 1. The Senate as a chamber of sober second thought, but it has no honor. Parliament is the only democratic element but unable to honourably dispatch its duty. 2. A system based upon science and facts providing real knowledge and intelligent information, but Harper dishonourably constrains science and hides open debate. (One Man Party, Harris p.419-20) 3. The opportunity of the public to select and vote for a representative who has the responsibility to speak for his electorate honestly but is hindered by Harper and Parliament is, “almost unable to do the job people expect of it” (Harris p.421). Conservative Representatives it seems are provided speaking notes by Harper. Yet parties are not mentioned in the Constitution. 4. None of the processes can work without the element of free speech guaranteed in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and delivered inviolate by the peoples elected members, a free senate and the peoples media the CBC which under CRTC law must provide both sides of a story. Harper uses the CBC to spread scare tactics supporting his campaign while hiding the death rates and enormous costs caused by fossil fuels. 5. Henry the Eight based government upon the separation of church and state. Harper is changing this. 6. Canada had a very successful diplomatic service and foreign relations policies and that were central to our development as a peace loving nation. Harper has taken the opposite stand to Canadian diplomacy traditions encouraging war. This has incurred threats from ISIS, so he caused the fear he now uses on his electoral campaign. 7. We like all western democracies have had an excellent health, education and pension services. These are now in a state of erosion.

C. CHANGING THE STYLE AND FORMAT OF GOVERNMENT
To make serious changes to the format of government there would be the complete and honorable expectation that there would be a) pre election information of the plan and this would be followed by perhaps b) an election and at least c) the full and open debate in parliament and d) perhaps a plebiscite or referendum. To attempt to impose such a significant change without the above precepts would likely be considered in terms of the pre Harper Parliament be a subversive if not traitorous act. Certainly in time of war and Harper has said we are at war against terrorism. Terrorism can be in defined in different terms. Removing democracy is certainly one. All of these premises have been broken by PM Harper. One could according to the tradition of parliament say that none of the bills passed by Harper’s majority would have any validity in Canada’s pre Harper parliament, and consequently should be repealed. The other question is, “Is Harper guilty of undemocratic behavior?” He has imposed his words upon his members who have to speak according to Harper’s notes derailing the idea of independently voted in representatives of the people speaking for the wishes of the people that elected them. He closed down scientific studies and libraries while building a platform for unsubstantiated, mythological or self serving views to replace factual based judgment. There may be an omnibus bill that includes the right for the PM to make laws under a regulation perhaps like the USA. This relates to Harper’s desire to have a republic.

D. HARPER’S ACTIONS DEMONSTRATE WHAT HE WILL DO TO CANADA
1. FREE SPEECH He has taken free speech away from Canadians. The CBC is gagged. The PC members we elect to speak for us in Parliament are not allowed to speak unless it is from notes provided. Elected members were in principle elected to speak for their electorate not for their party.
2. AGRICULTURE Harper’s influence upon agriculture has been to close down the Canadian Wheat Board . This meant that farmers would have to make their own sales, generally get less for their wheat and become less productive. Only few large farmers near the US border would benefit. Harper has destroyed exactly that process and benefits from Canadian agriculture.
3. DEMOCRACY Is a method of government for the people, by the people, of the people. It has become, ‘of the people, by an unelected senate, and by a parliament not allowed to debate all issues of Bills and by an increasingly dictatorial prime minister.’
4. FOREIGN AFFAIRS Canada has had a long and highly respected foreign policy and encouraged peace keeping in Cyprus, the Balkans and other places. Our prestige came from not strongly siding with one party or the other in conflict but by being a reliable and highly appreciated peacekeeper and negotiator. We resisted nuclear weapons and were a middle size nation with no territorial ambitions. We had a budget to help the poorer countries in disasters and had a very desirable birth control program in Africa under CIDA. Virtually every country in the world is now over populated measured as by people caused collapse of ecosystems. Some measure population only in terms of market, others interpret a biblical approval to over populate – wrongly. The bible does not say over populate the earth until, you have destroy the earth.
Dr. Stephen Brown says (Party of One, p. 224) money from “CIDA is being used to have … Canadian tax payers underwrite costs of private Canadian companies doing all …the damage of consequences of mining abroad … [CIDA moneys] pay for their [companies] own misdeeds.” CIDA’s budget is used to pay private companies costs. But this was not debated in parliament. The highly respected diplomat Heinbecker says Harper’s “foreign policy shows inexperience, ignorance, incompetence and ideology.” Ideology is the worst.
Harper stands to be placed on the boards of many companies making himself rich at Canada’s expense. He has destroyed Canada’s reputation abroad. The other half of the pattern is again the influence of his extreme evangelistic beliefs that are not so unlike extremist Muslim beliefs. Death rates do not bother him. War to him is better than negotiation and peacekeeping.
5. EDUCATION Harper recently elaborated upon how a past government took money away from education to balance its books. This it seems to me is a warning that we can expect the reduction of funding for education to pay for the Iraq/Syrian and upcoming Ukrainian/Russian wars. Education asks questions about society, history, religion, biology, physics and all of the universe.
Education if not hindered by The War On Science (National Geographic) would clarify some extreme beliefs and false ideas that some want imposed on education. So Harper closes libraries. But the future of jobs and progress also depend upon that same education.
6. HEALTH The universal health system is always a priority of Canadians but Harper has, “washed his hand of the health system.” (Globe & Mail July 25, 2013. Picard. A 9). Harper has promised to remove billions from the health system in 2016. He will delay the election until then and we can expect the loss of medicare by 2016 in order to fight wars which are a NATO responsibility. He wants a private health system but the Roy Romanov report, past premier of Saskatchewan, showed a private system is at least 11% or more expensive and has poorer outcomes than public systems, never accurately disputed. The impact is war and religion trump health care. 7. PENSIONS Present pensions CPP and OAS are guaranteed payout pensions. Harper wants a guaranteed payment up front for the pension plan. That is the fund would be invested on the stock market and only the gains would be paid out. The losses would also reduce the pension fund and we may now be looking at a period of deflation. But the government can have a long term view, statisticians depend upon that to calculate expected growth. The individual cannot hire a statistician nor depend upon the long term view. He/She gets what one has today. Seniors would only get the gains made on the stock market but as well take the losses on a short term basis and would likely not do well. If there last working years occurred
in 2007-2009 many pensioners would starve when market returns were low or even negative. Individuals can not have the long view of governments.
8. ECONOMICS Harper due to poor management supporting only a single industry, fossil fuels which then created the Dutch effect (Selling oil raising the value of the dollar, increasing costs and reducing Canadian manufacturing.) and caused the loss of fifty thousand jobs in Ontario and Quebec. If economics is defined a s : income minus costs =profits, Harper has defined costs in a very narrow way including only: labor, materials, plant construction, marketing and transport of product. The real costs are more than ever now recognized to be huge and increasingly dangerous and include: acidification of the oceans, loss of wild populations, collapsing ecosystems, extinctions, pollution, death rates and climate warming projected to produce mega drought in the central and SW USA … and ultimately globally killing millions. Sorry climate warming is already killing millions. (4 m per year the Economist. Sept 20. p.24) Reports of death rates from mega droughts will be in the hundreds of millions and billions, since droughts by late in this century will likely be world wide. The mega drought has been tested by climate models and all models verify this mega drought. ( Burroughs, Climate Warming). This is the scientific projection if we do not take action.
Harper has withdrawn Canada from international climate agreements claiming they will cost too much while in reality the fossil fuel caused climate crises today costs $ trillions and is projected by the end of the century to cost equal to global GDP. He has caused Canada to be seen as “The idiot boy of the climate change crisis.” ( Party of One p 222).
Harper has not kept up and has a limited knowledge of todays economics. But his religion does not require it.
Harper has initiated Free Trade agreements with China for the sake of selling oil but in fact the net effect will be a lowering of salaries for Canadians. The European Free trade agreement has not been discussed and may again not be helpful to Canada.
Harper may sell wheat to Europe but now there will always be a food market, but Canada will lose out on sales of value added manufactured goods which is the future of Canada. He would hope to sell vast amounts of oil but this would bring about the end of life on our planet as we know it. (Hansen, Storms of My Grandchildren.)
An oil economy with the second largest fossil fuel resources in the world would produce climate warming beyond the tipping point causing ever higher human death rates finally to the billions. IS THIS A SATANIC
9. BANKING AND FINANCE CSBC bank supported and assisted the rich to evade taxes. This is an illegal act. Harper allowed the rich corporations to just return their due taxes and there would be no penalty. So the parallel is that one can rob a bank and if one gets caught, so long as one returns the money there will be no penalty. This is theft, the only difference is that some corporations are stealing from the largest bank in Canada, the people.
Second Harper never recovered the $one million of the peoples tax money from Mulroney even though he gained it upon lying in court. One might conclude it is OK to steal – risk is non existent.
10. WAR In the Iraq war Harper was one of the earliest to send aircraft to the Mideast. These aircraft were not requested and this is the opposite of Canada’s earlier highly respected foreign policy to try to be the negotiator and peacemaker. We had an excellent reputation as all todays wars ultimately require final negotiation (Kerry) and never just a military solution as was the case in the past.
Harper entered a fire fight first with aircraft and then on the ground in Iraq. He is now (While the USA and Germany are trying to negotiate peace.) lined up to be the first to send offensive weapons to Ukraine and to put soldiers on the ground as trainers, but of course we know that in the past these trainers were in active fire fights just like the aircraft. Putin now sees Canada as the enemy. In the meantime Canada has no protection in the Canadian Arctic and Putin has mobilized vast number of troops in the Russian Arctic. Putin has no qualms about attacking other countries and would place all the Balkan countries under his kleptocractic rule again if he is not stopped first by the Europeans and NATO. The Russians can beat the Ukraine and Canada with one hand tied behind its back. This decision of Harpers without all of Europe, NATO and the USA as allies is extremely foolhardy. It could justify Russia walking into the Canadian Arctic and controlling all of the arctic oil. Putin would love that. Canada has no arctic defense at all. But Harper thinks his action will help get him into Heaven. The USA may well not act in Ukraine because they want no complications with CUBA or perhaps do not want to be challenged in the arctic or have further problems in the Mideast.
As some journalists have alleged Harper’s motivation is he wishes to fight the Armageddon, the last battle between good and evil and in his mind assure himself a place in heaven.
Harper’s militaristic efforts defy any logic that would truly help Canada. Moneys for defense should first be for a military base in the Arctic. F35′s with little range are of no value there. His warmongering is not Christian in terms of turning the other cheek and is more likely a satanic response to a God’s good earth.
11. SCIENCE Harper has attacked science. He has shut down the internationally acclaimed Fresh Water Research Station near Kenora, Ontario and discarded books in the garbage. He has closed at least seven scientific libraries and wants to final edit all scientific reports to change conclusions as was attempted by Bush on climate reports in the USA. Scientists are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their grants and I have seen this at presentations.
At the same time Harper enjoys what science has produced: modern transport, manufactured goods, heated and cooled homes and commercial buildings. His stance is entirely hypocritical. In some ways it is similar to Pol Pots philosophy. On TV it appeared as if Harper had a hard time saying that people should get their children inoculated for measles. Death means to him an ascendance to heaven. Also with growing global population and consumption and increasingly extreme weather, all causing decline in species and ecosystems, our planet is less livable.
He has set the country back fifty years in Science. Stopped critical research. Has a religious view despises anything he thinks is not God given whereas science is not despised in Christian biblical terms.
12. INTEGRITY Harper plays with truth. (After This Everything Changes). Before being elected Harper promised to reform the Senate. Instead he loaded it with Conservatives and used it to vote down a critically important legal environmental bill passed by a democratic majority in Parliament.(Jan. 30, 2015. G and M). This act has has caused Canadians an unmeasurable sum. In the past practice the Senate would never vote down a bill past by parliament. Is he involved in miscreant behavior?
When Mulroney was caught with hundreds of thousands of dollars in a paper bag and the air bus possible bribery case was under way, Harper refused to have the investigative commission investigate both the air bus affair and the Mulroney hundreds of thousands of money in a paper bag at the same time. So Mulroney got off and won a million dollar award from the government. Then it was found that Mulroney lied in court and Harper made no effort to recover the peoples million dollars of tax money. Is this like letting tax evaders off without penalty?
During the robo calls affair the electoral commissioner, not beholding to the Conservatives, was responsible to investigate. It was discovered that the calls came from the Conservatives offices. The PC s were fined two fines each in the thousands of dollars. Basically this implies Conservative complicity though they denied guilt. But rather than correct this problem Harper has had the electoral commissioner placed under the Minister of Justice, assuring that the Conservative party can no longer be investigated by the electoral commissioner. The next election in Oct 2015 (probably will be delayed to 2016) could be the most crooked election if it is manipulated by Conservatives.
The RCMP has a strong public image and support. He has now placed more Canadian security investigation under the responsibility of CSIS, an agency controlled by a Conservative minister. This means that anyone can be arrested for any crime and held without trial under power that CSIS is allowed. The reason for arrest can be kept secret. Habeus Corpus is canceled. It means a police state.
He has not got a mandate from the public. The public was never informed of his plans. The past parliamentary elections were not based upon public notification of intentions. Is it democratic?
One can now question Harper’s honesty and integrity and whether his actions are in fact legal. Real investigations have been incomplete due to his interference. If the next election became crooked Harper would not allow the Conservatives to be investigate 13. RELIGION In general religions are not democratic nor do they always permit freedom of speech. When religions are responsible for governing they often become less tolerant; the Spanish Inquisition, the Thirty Years War, a conservative Turkey has allowed religious minorities to be persecuted. Totally religious based governments soon become intolerant. Simple things such as evolution and climate warming are not believed so that encourages ignorance. (National Geographic, March 2015) Some interpret holy books saying that people should not limit their reproduction and encourage more and more populating of the earth. But of greater concern is The Economist’s description March 7, 2015, p25., that some, “nuclear powers are more risk averse,” and there is “a wariness of leaders who feel their regimes to be… under threat… whose religion or ideology embraces apocalyptic confrontation” (Armageddon) as seems to be the case with ISIS and perhaps with Harper. That is such extremists would not hesitate to use nuclar weapons if they had them. Consequently Harper’s reckless involvement in Iraq and Ukraine, which now has cost one Canadian life and perhaps because it plays out internationally will cost much more, is a horrible idea. DID GOD WANT HIS EARTH DESTROYED?
D. THE OVERALL CONDITIONS FOR REMEDIATION
1.The independence of the electoral commissioner must be reinstated or if not could Harper be investigated for possible subversive behavior even though he is using Parliament and the Senate. These changes must be submitted to the electorate for decision.
2. Harper has , “pushed through omnibus bills ….with little or no debate.”… “AMENDED 60 LAWS, REPEALED 6, AND ADDED THREE MORE.” (Harris p.421.) Many without debate. It all omnibus bills should be repealed.
3. The Huffington Post has researched and shown Harper to be a member of an extremist evangelical group. Harper sees himself as the right hand of supreme religious righteousness. All his moves correlate with that. He feels he has religious right to do what he has done. Does this sound familiar? Is he is trying to set up a theocracy with himself as head and not responsible to any one – thus his fight with the supreme court. His approach is very much similar to that in Iran in form but his policies and actions on fossil fuels are incurring damages like Isis.
4. Harper is an extreme hypocrite and is dangerous to democracy. Extreme religion sees no benefit in science. Harper uses science based aircraft, cars, home heating and cooling, electronic communication but then has destroyed seven or more scientific libraries, closed the freshwater lakes research center east of Kenora (Party of One) and scientists are afraid to speak out or they could lose their grants. He has reduced grants to science and set back Canada by 50 years by destroying science programs. Research must be rebuilt.
5. He has strongly supported fossil fuels companies because he saw a great opportunity to gain financial support from them. If he is appointed to oil company boards after his term is up he will be remunerated handsomely. Media do not report the damages done by the fossil fuels companies because oil companies control profitable advertising and have shareholding controls. Many of the climate warming events have created terrible catastrophes. The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is the only one that has made a small incomplete effort to repair its damages. Otherwise the taxpayer is always on the hook for fossil fuel companies costs. The Philippine typhoon 10,000 dead, hurricane Sandy 57 dead and 50 billion dollars in costs, the European heat wave 2003, 30,000 dead, the Burma Hurricane Naga 138,000 dead. The IPCC Fifth study proved with 95% statistical accuracy that climate warming is a human caused event from burning fossil fuels and releasing carbon dioxide. In science 95% is basically absolute. The carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming. In part measures were taken on land and also ocean temperature increases shown by thermometers floating in the oceans and at depth. Dr. Stanford and others have shown how climate is modified. Greater evaporation and formation of rivers in the sky caused deluges of rain in Alberta floods killing a few for a total of 51 deaths from fossil fuels in Canada. The speeding up of ice cap melting has been measured by Dr. Barber U. of Manitoba. Other measures include, “Thinning of ice in central Arctic by 65% between 1975 and 2012. .. 36% reduction in thickness between 1975 and 2000.” (Arctic Cryosphere, University of Washington, ENN March 3, 2015). Fossil fuels burning must stop and CO2 re sequestered in wells not fracked.
6. DEATH RATES. The United Nations Environmental Program has stated that 250,000 die each year from climate change events. (Time, April 2010) the Dana Group says 400,000 die each year from climate change. More recently The Economist reported that four million die each year from fossil fuels, “Coal also kills a lot of people. Outdoor air pollution largely from coal though also from cars and other industry, kills four million people a year, more than any infectious disease, in so doing has huge economic effects”. These are facts from the Better Growth Better Climate report, ( written by 4 former presidents or PMs , 2 Nobel economics laureates, World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank). (The Economist, Sept. 20, 2014. P. 23-24) Harper has exclusively supported the fossil fuel companies. The true cost of gas USF is $6.25 pg and diesel $7.72 pg. (Drew Shindell, Duke U. ). About $2.00 per liter Canadian but likely all costs are not in. Harper with his unthinking total support of the fossil fuel companies has policies that seem complicit in these global death rates. Just as the Thorpe RCMP jailed the man that handed the gun to the man that killed the four RCMP officers, Harper has handed the means to the fossil uels companies. So we have it Harper exclusively supports the fossil fuel companies: Those companies are largely responsible (they mislead people about being green.) for climate warming. Climate warming causes disasters that kill about one million children each year but the bible says “suffer little children to come unto me.” Is there a satanic influence to these extremist views? One cannot contribute to killing children and claim one is a Christian.
We need to impose law for killing or complicit in the act and for reimbursing costs caused.
7. Law Harper has attacked the supreme court because it overruled him. He sees himself as the supreme decision maker. He has now redesigned criminal law, “CONSERVATIVES MOVE TO GIVE JURIES A SAY” This means juries can make a recommendation to the Judge but under this law, “ a marked departure from Canadian sentencing,“ .. “asking juries to answer specific questions” and …” provides a review by the public safety minister ….the minister may conduct the review on his own.“… “ who makes a recommendation to cabinet, which is responsible for the ultimate decision .” (the Globe and Mail, March 12 , 2015.) The sentence is the power over conviction.. The cabinet knows little about law and power is taken away form the judge who is the specialist in law, thus weakening our legal system but gives Harper the power via the control he has over his ministers in cabinet, which now appears absolute like a dictator. Thus seriously undermining our legal system. Politics overrides the legal system. This is hugely destructive. The senate and legal system are now controlled by the PM leaving no means to reign in the authority and dictatorship of one person, the PM. This dictatorship must be reversed. 8. Managing a Dictatorial Government This is the bandwagon Harper is on. His extreme religious views he thinks
makes it all right. Recently Harper has sent Canadian Aircraft to fight in a very real fire fight in Syria. In his view he is fighting Armageddon, the final battle of good over evil and will be rewarded with a go-to-heaven card. These aircraft were not requested and we would have been better of playing the peace card. All groups say this Syrian war will never be won militarily. But this increased military participation gets reaction from ISIS and now allows Harper to play his “fear mongering” card for election time. (Fear based leaflets have already come out of the Conservative offices in a voting district in Manitoba) and it will be used to justify and remove more rights from Canadians, now in process. Now since he has already ceded some investigation rights to CSIS, and recently given more power to CSIS to hold people longer, he is in fact giving himself more power. All is set to transform Canada into a republic. Much has been put on line about the so called benefits of a republic. It will actually be much less democratic. The next step will be to allow any group to donate any amount of money (A simple act in a majority government) to any party they wish. An evangelical Christian actually said only evangelicals should hold seats in Parliament. Since unlimited use of the media controls most peoples thinking Harper will have set himself up as permanent PM of a Theocracy managed by CSIS police soon under direction to become less tolerant. This must be reversed.

CONCLUSIONS
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.
He is ensured that he:
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
Lack of freedom of speech has gone a way too far. His huge changes were never on his proposed electoral agenda. If he has not acted in the best interests of Canadians what is he up to? Why is this man still here? He has disrespected all the covenants Diefenbaker held dear. His actions threaten Canadian democracy. He has seen to it that republicanism is favorably discussed on line especially for religious organizations. Totally religious governments usually become dictatorial.
I am afraid there is little time as Harper will use his majority in Parliament to turn Canada into a religious dictatorship run as a republic by an undemocratically appointed electoral college. Religious extremism
knows no bounds. Only Canadians can make this decision as we have freedom of speech. We need a referendum or plebiscite. The people own parliament.
Harper through controlling – elected members of parliament voices in Parliament, – the senate – as well as increasing security laws and – limiting our civil rights and – placing the Electoral Commissioner under his control, controls crime sentencing and has increasingly set us up for a dictatorial theocracy government.
I hope I am wrong but all the evidence points to Harper’s subversively undercutting the peoples choice of government. Is he a traitor to his own election promises?
Please pass this on and demonstrate May first before Harper makes more controlling laws. We need an on line plebiscite or referendum to ask what Canadian’s want. We have to remember Harper had no mandate to make such significant changes. Canada is not now a democracy. Just through Harper’s eyes.. We need a plebiscite or referendum. Harper had no public electoral support to make these changes.
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CHARTER WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH,THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMITTED AGAINST THESE RIGHTS. climatedisaster.com
References: The Huffington Post; The Party of One, Michael Harris; After this Everything Changes, Naomi Kline; Kill the Messengers, Mark Bourrie. National Geographic. Bouroughs Climate Warming., The Globe and Mail.
Referendum Yes No
1. PM Harper must resign _____ _____
2. All Harper omnibus bills should be repealed _____ _____
3. All Harper bills changing power controls in
government must be repealed _____ _____

HARPER AS DICTATOR
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.
Has a delay-deny-die policy towards veterans
PM Harper has ensured that he:
Controls the elected members of his party.
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Wants to change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
Will delay elections until he has control of access to Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
References: Eeric Gottardi Cdn Bar re “Violation of the Charter”: M. Bourrie Kill the Messengers: Harris One man Party : Kline “After This Everything Changes”. Quotes -Jonathan Kay “Biggest control freak Ottawa has ever known”. Farley Mowat “ S. Harper is probably the most dangerous human being elected to power in Canada.” L. Martin, “Harper is turning Canada into an anti-democracy.” Bob Rae, “I find Harper to be the most deeply partisan and divisive person in Canadian History.” A student of German history described Harper’s methods for taking over government as similar to Hitlers in his early days.
Under Harper we are no longer a democracy. climatedisaster.com
Your decision;
Harper should resign——- or Stay———-

Lack of freedom of speech has gone a way too far. His huge changes were never on his proposed electoral agenda. If he has not acted in the best interests of Canadians what is he up to? Why is this man still here? He has disrespected all the covenants Diefenbaker held dear. His actions threaten Canadian democracy. He has seen to it that republicanism is favorably discussed on line especially for religious organizations. Totally religious governments usually become dictatorial.
I am afraid there is little time as Harper will use his majority in Parliament to turn Canada into a religious dictatorship run as a republic by an undemocraticaly appointed electoral college as in the USA. Religious extremism
knows no bounds. Only Canadians can make this decision as we have freedom of speech. We need a referendum or plebiscite. The people own parliament.
Harper through controlling – elected members of parliament voices in Parliament, – the senate – as well as increasing security laws and – limiting our civil rights and – placing the Electoral Commissioner under his control, controls crime sentencing and has increasingly set us up for a dictatorial theocracy government.
I hope I am wrong but all the evidence points to Harper’s subversively undercutting the peoples choice of government. Is he a traitor to his own election promises?

————————–

Could you forward to as many delegates as possible.
The news on climate warming gets worse. On Line see “NASA Mega drought Earth Observation” Live model. Say by “ ten or more years of data
put through 17 climate models and all agree there will be by 2050 an 80% chance  of a 2 to 4 decade drought . (Of course much agriculture will fail).
 
The death rates are never spoken about. We go on for weeks about an abducted girl but fail to address climate catastrophes as an ongoing story getting worse each year.
- 2010 United Nations Environmental Program  says 250,000 die each year from fossil fuel caused climate warming. Time,April,2010 and IPCC 5th report
- 2010  Dana group (Insurance industry) says 400,000 die each year  from climate warming
- 2013 (I think) China reported 100,000 deaths in China (badly underestimated.)
- 2014 I saw a report  said 770,000 die each year (cant find reference)
- 2015 Better Growth Better Climate (written by  4 ex  presidents and prime ministers, Asian Development Bank,  2 Nobel laureate economists, World Bank, IMF and men form NY University and Princeton U.) States 4 million die per year from fossil fuels caused climate warming. Quoted in The Economist Sep 20,2014 p 23-4 and IPCC 5th report
 
Could you forward this to other delegates. It seems the whole truth about Harper is not getting out. One Man Party – Harris  and Kill the Messengers  – Mark Bourrie are very good but few have the time to read a whole book these days. 
We need a carbon tax here  as BC has. Cap and trade do not work, see article in Harper’s nine pages long. Also see on line : “NASA  Mega Drought earth Observation.” It states  “after using data  from 10 or more years and subjecting it to  17 climate models all agreed there would be an 80% chance there would be a mega drought of 2 to 4 decades long after 2050″ Imagine the loss of crops!
By 2050 an As the leader said  from Philipins  “Stop this insanity”
This needs to be dealt with or our grand children will suffer seriously.  I doubt politicians know the details.

————————– 
 
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices. He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.

  ——— —————
PM Harper has ensured that he:
Controls the elected members of his party.
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Wants to change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
References: Eeric Gottardi Cdn Bar re “Violation of the Charter”, Harris, One Man Party. Kline After This Everything Changes.
 

CHANGING GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS FOR DICTATORSHIP

Posted by Willard Anderson on April 4th, 2015.

Yes it has happened. He is now trying to override the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“PARLIAMENT CAN HARDLY BE WEAKENED ANY MORE THAN IT ALREADY IS. HARPER CAN’T GO MUCH FURTHER WITHOUT MAKING THE INSTITUTION DYSFUNCTIONAL. HE IS TRYING TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF HOUSE BUSINESS. IN FACT, IT WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED TO ITS FORMER STATE BY SOMEONE IF WE ARE TO HAVE A DEMOCRACY.” (HARRIS .P. 431.) Between loss of our democracy and climate warming government is very destructive. THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. We need to : 1. Know the difference between fact, belief and opinion and look to what are our probable heated futures. 2. Know that we depend totally upon the normal physical, biological and ecological natural laws that influence earth and we are victim of negative human influence. 3. Know that freedom of speech and democracy were once founding government precepts.
4. Know that when CSIS has more power the public has less freedom. Harper has given CSIS more power and implies that if peaceful demonstrators interfere with the fossil fuel industry which through climate warming is globally killing four million people a year (more than one million children), he will impose the full strength of the law and constrain one with out right of trial. 5. Know that the significance of computers is multiplying the speed of research and invention but also that they are only one of the macro influences upon earth. 6. Know that biological sciences have lagged. the human body was studied but the fundamental importance of biology in terms of the total earth populations and ecosystem sustainability was dismissed. It interfered with the business model. Harper sees no need for full understanding of the bio-physical laws of the earth since it does not apply to a theoretical belief system such as religions. 7. Know that carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released through burning fossil fuels in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming and climate disasters. We recognized fossil fuel caused CO2 build up by 1900 and had better measures by 1957. CO2 emissions targets a decade or two ago was 350 ppm in order to maintain a liveable climate. We are now over 400 ppm! We need a change back to what the 1700 CO2 concentrations were and those targets need to be met in a decade. We can do it as we mobilized for the second world war in one year. Harper has turned on the extinction time bomb. We have little time to reverse climate warming. 8.Know there must be national and global action by the UN to implement serious jail penalties for: oil companies not implementing the pumping out of CO2 from the atmosphere and for not paying for oil to green energy replacement. They need to phase in closure of fossil fuel drilling, fracking and pumping. All wells must be tested for leakage and maintained and now methane releases in the high arctic require close monitoring. These are fossil fuel company costs. We must reward companies that recover CO2 from the atmosphere and produce mostly green energy 9. Know that the death rates from fossil fuels and success on these above endeavors must be posted on every big cities Times Square and posted on the net as well as noted on absolutely every weather forecast.
This is the new normal. Without it we die. The facts are in. Some deniers or religions may refute this but they are ignorant or may be Satanists. We should rapidly come to know them, and prosecute hate propaganda and those that deny climate warming. (The War on Science, March 2015)

B. THE DISHONORABLE MAN
The Canadian parliamentary system is adapted from English systems and traditions. Diefenbaker said: it was important to honor the precepts of the democratic system. Today we have: 1. The Senate as a chamber of sober second thought, but it has no honor. Parliament is the only democratic element but unable to honourably dispatch its duty. 2. A system based upon science and facts providing real knowledge and intelligent information, but Harper dishonourably constrains science and hides open debate. (One Man Party, Harris p.419-20) 3. The opportunity of the public to select and vote for a representative who has the responsibility to speak for his electorate honestly but is hindered by Harper and Parliament is, “almost unable to do the job people expect of it” (Harris p.421). Conservative Representatives it seems are provided speaking notes by Harper. Yet parties are not mentioned in the Constitution. 4. None of the processes can work without the element of free speech guaranteed in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and delivered inviolate by the peoples elected members, a free senate and the peoples media the CBC which under CRTC law must provide both sides of a story. Harper uses the CBC to spread scare tactics supporting his campaign while hiding the death rates and enormous costs caused by fossil fuels. 5. Henry the Eight based government upon the separation of church and state. Harper is changing this. 6. Canada had a very successful diplomatic service and foreign relations policies and that were central to our development as a peace loving nation. Harper has taken the opposite stand to Canadian diplomacy traditions encouraging war. This has incurred threats from ISIS, so he caused the fear he now uses on his electoral campaign. 7. We like all western democracies have had an excellent health, education and pension services. These are now in a state of erosion.

C. CHANGING THE STYLE AND FORMAT OF GOVERNMENT
To make serious changes to the format of government there would be the complete and honorable expectation that there would be a) pre election information of the plan and this would be followed by perhaps b) an election and at least c) the full and open debate in parliament and d) perhaps a plebiscite or referendum. To attempt to impose such a significant change without the above precepts would likely be considered in terms of the pre Harper Parliament be a subversive if not traitorous act. Certainly in time of war and Harper has said we are at war against terrorism. Terrorism can be in defined in different terms. Removing democracy is certainly one. All of these premises have been broken by PM Harper. One could according to the tradition of parliament say that none of the bills passed by Harper’s majority would have any validity in Canada’s pre Harper parliament, and consequently should be repealed. The other question is, “Is Harper guilty of undemocratic behavior?” He has imposed his words upon his members who have to speak according to Harper’s notes derailing the idea of independently voted in representatives of the people speaking for the wishes of the people that elected them. He closed down scientific studies and libraries while building a platform for unsubstantiated, mythological or self serving views to replace factual based judgment. There may be an omnibus bill that includes the right for the PM to make laws under a regulation perhaps like the USA. This relates to Harper’s desire to have a republic.

D. HARPER’S ACTIONS DEMONSTRATE WHAT HE WILL DO TO CANADA
1. FREE SPEECH He has taken free speech away from Canadians. The CBC is gagged. The PC members we elect to speak for us in Parliament are not allowed to speak unless it is from notes provided. Elected members were in principle elected to speak for their electorate not for their party.
2. AGRICULTURE Harper’s influence upon agriculture has been to close down the Canadian Wheat Board . This meant that farmers would have to make their own sales, generally get less for their wheat and become less productive. Only few large farmers near the US border would benefit. Harper has destroyed exactly that process and benefits from Canadian agriculture.
3. DEMOCRACY Is a method of government for the people, by the people, of the people. It has become, ‘of the people, by an unelected senate, and by a parliament not allowed to debate all issues of Bills and by an increasingly dictatorial prime minister.’
4. FOREIGN AFFAIRS Canada has had a long and highly respected foreign policy and encouraged peace keeping in Cyprus, the Balkans and other places. Our prestige came from not strongly siding with one party or the other in conflict but by being a reliable and highly appreciated peacekeeper and negotiator. We resisted nuclear weapons and were a middle size nation with no territorial ambitions. We had a budget to help the poorer countries in disasters and had a very desirable birth control program in Africa under CIDA. Virtually every country in the world is now over populated measured as by people caused collapse of ecosystems. Some measure population only in terms of market, others interpret a biblical approval to over populate – wrongly. The bible does not say over populate the earth until, you have destroy the earth.
Dr. Stephen Brown says (Party of One, p. 224) money from “CIDA is being used to have … Canadian tax payers underwrite costs of private Canadian companies doing all …the damage of consequences of mining abroad … [CIDA moneys] pay for their [companies] own misdeeds.” CIDA’s budget is used to pay private companies costs. But this was not debated in parliament. The highly respected diplomat Heinbecker says Harper’s “foreign policy shows inexperience, ignorance, incompetence and ideology.” Ideology is the worst.
Harper stands to be placed on the boards of many companies making himself rich at Canada’s expense. He has destroyed Canada’s reputation abroad. The other half of the pattern is again the influence of his extreme evangelistic beliefs that are not so unlike extremist Muslim beliefs. Death rates do not bother him. War to him is better than negotiation and peacekeeping.
5. EDUCATION Harper recently elaborated upon how a past government took money away from education to balance its books. This it seems to me is a warning that we can expect the reduction of funding for education to pay for the Iraq/Syrian and upcoming Ukrainian/Russian wars. Education asks questions about society, history, religion, biology, physics and all of the universe.
Education if not hindered by The War On Science (National Geographic) would clarify some extreme beliefs and false ideas that some want imposed on education. So Harper closes libraries. But the future of jobs and progress also depend upon that same education.
6. HEALTH The universal health system is always a priority of Canadians but Harper has, “washed his hand of the health system.” (Globe & Mail July 25, 2013. Picard. A 9). Harper has promised to remove billions from the health system in 2016. He will delay the election until then and we can expect the loss of medicare by 2016 in order to fight wars which are a NATO responsibility. He wants a private health system but the Roy Romanov report, past premier of Saskatchewan, showed a private system is at least 11% or more expensive and has poorer outcomes than public systems, never accurately disputed. The impact is war and religion trump health care.
7. PENSIONS Present pensions CPP and OAS are guaranteed payout pensions. Harper wants a guaranteed payment up front for the pension plan. That is the fund would be invested on the stock market and only the gains would be paid out. The losses would also reduce the pension fund and we may now be looking at a period of deflation. But the government can have a long term view, statisticians depend upon that to calculate expected growth. The individual cannot hire a statistician nor depend upon the long term view. He/She gets what one has today. Seniors would only get the gains made on the stock market but as well take the losses on a short term basis and would likely not do well. If there last working years occurred
in 2007-2009 many pensioners would starve when market returns were low or even negative. Individuals can not have the long view of governments.
8. ECONOMICS Harper due to poor management supporting only a single industry, fossil fuels which then created the Dutch effect (Selling oil raising the value of the dollar, increasing costs and reducing Canadian manufacturing.) and caused the loss of fifty thousand jobs in Ontario and Quebec. If economics is defined a s : income minus costs =profits, Harper has defined costs in a very narrow way including only: labor, materials, plant construction, marketing and transport of product. The real costs are more than ever now recognized to be huge and increasingly dangerous and include: acidification of the oceans, loss of wild populations, collapsing ecosystems, extinctions, pollution, death rates and climate warming projected to produce mega drought in the central and SW USA … and ultimately globally killing millions. Sorry climate warming is already killing millions. (4 m per year the Economist. Sept 20. p.24) Reports of death rates from mega droughts will be in the hundreds of millions and billions, since droughts by late in this century will likely be world wide. The mega drought has been tested by climate models and all models verify this mega drought. ( Burroughs, Climate Warming). This is the scientific projection if we do not take action.
Harper has withdrawn Canada from international climate agreements claiming they will cost too much while in reality the fossil fuel caused climate crises today costs $ trillions and is projected by the end of the century to cost equal to global GDP. He has caused Canada to be seen as “The idiot boy of the climate change crisis.” ( Party of One p 222).
Harper has not kept up and has a limited knowledge of todays economics. But his religion does not require it.
Harper has initiated Free Trade agreements with China for the sake of selling oil but in fact the net effect will be a lowering of salaries for Canadians. The European Free trade agreement has not been discussed and may again not be helpful to Canada.
Harper may sell wheat to Europe but now there will always be a food market, but Canada will lose out on sales of value added manufactured goods which is the future of Canada. He would hope to sell vast amounts of oil but this would bring about the end of life on our planet as we know it. (Hansen, Storms of My Grandchildren.)
An oil economy with the second largest fossil fuel resources in the world would produce climate warming beyond the tipping point causing ever higher human death rates finally to the billions. IS THIS A SATANIC
9. BANKING AND FINANCE CSBC bank supported and assisted the rich to evade taxes. This is an illegal act. Harper allowed the rich corporations to just return their due taxes and there would be no penalty. So the parallel is that one can rob a bank and if one gets caught, so long as one returns the money there will be no penalty. This is theft, the only difference is that some corporations are stealing from the largest bank in Canada, the people.
Second Harper never recovered the $one million of the peoples tax money from Mulroney even though he gained it upon lying in court. One might conclude it is OK to steal – risk is non existent.
10. WAR In the Iraq war Harper was one of the earliest to send aircraft to the Mideast. These aircraft were not requested and this is the opposite of Canada’s earlier highly respected foreign policy to try to be the negotiator and peacemaker. We had an excellent reputation as all todays wars ultimately require final negotiation (Kerry) and never just a military solution as was the case in the past.
Harper entered a fire fight first with aircraft and then on the ground in Iraq. He is now (While the USA and Germany are trying to negotiate peace.) lined up to be the first to send offensive weapons to Ukraine and to put soldiers on the ground as trainers, but of course we know that in the past these trainers were in active fire fights just like the aircraft. Putin now sees Canada as the enemy. In the meantime Canada has no protection in the Canadian Arctic and Putin has mobilized vast number of troops in the Russian Arctic. Putin has no qualms about attacking other countries and would place all the Balkan countries under his kleptocractic rule again if he is not stopped first by the Europeans and NATO. The Russians can beat the Ukraine and Canada with one hand tied behind its back. This decision of Harpers without all of Europe, NATO and the USA as allies is extremely foolhardy. It could justify Russia walking into the Canadian Arctic and controlling all of the arctic oil. Putin would love that. Canada has no arctic defense at all. But Harper thinks his action will help get him into Heaven. The USA may well not act in Ukraine because they want no complications with CUBA or perhaps do not want to be challenged in the arctic or have further problems in the Mideast.
As some journalists have alleged Harper’s motivation is he wishes to fight the Armageddon, the last battle between good and evil and in his mind assure himself a place in heaven.
Harper’s militaristic efforts defy any logic that would truly help Canada. Moneys for defense should first be for a military base in the Arctic. F35′s with little range are of no value there. His warmongering is not Christian in terms of turning the other cheek and is more likely a satanic response to a God’s good earth.
11. SCIENCE Harper has attacked science. He has shut down the internationally acclaimed Fresh Water Research Station near Kenora, Ontario and discarded books in the garbage. He has closed at least seven scientific libraries and wants to final edit all scientific reports to change conclusions as was attempted by Bush on climate reports in the USA. Scientists are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their grants and I have seen this at presentations.
At the same time Harper enjoys what science has produced: modern transport, manufactured goods, heated and cooled homes and commercial buildings. His stance is entirely hypocritical. In some ways it is similar to Pol Pots philosophy. On TV it appeared as if Harper had a hard time saying that people should get their children inoculated for measles. Death means to him an ascendance to heaven. Also with growing global population and consumption and increasingly extreme weather, all causing decline in species and ecosystems, our planet is less liveable.
He has set the country back fifty years in Science. Stopped critical research. Has a religious view despises anything he thinks is not God given whereas science is not despised in Christian biblical terms.
12. INTEGRITY Harper plays with truth. (After This Everything Changes). Before being elected Harper promised to reform the Senate. Instead he loaded it with Conservatives and used it to vote down a critically important legal environmental bill passed by a democratic majority in Parliament.(Jan. 30, 2015. G and M). This act has has caused Canadians an unmeasurable sum. In the past practice the Senate would never vote down a bill past by parliament. Is he involved in miscreant behavior?
When Mulroney was caught with hundreds of thousands of dollars in a paper bag and the air bus possible bribery case was under way, Harper refused to have the investigative commission investigate both the air bus affair and the Mulroney hundreds of thousands of money in a paper bag at the same time. So Mulroney got off and won a million dollar award from the government. Then it was found that Mulroney lied in court and Harper made no effort to recover the peoples million dollars of tax money. Is this like letting tax evaders off without penalty?
During the robo calls affair the electoral commissioner, not beholding to the Conservatives, was responsible to investigate. It was discovered that the calls came from the Conservatives offices. The PC s were fined two fines each in the thousands of dollars. Basically this implies Conservative complicity though they denied guilt. But rather than correct this problem Harper has had the electoral commissioner placed under the Minister of Justice, assuring that the Conservative party can no longer be investigated by the electoral commissioner. The next election in Oct 2015 (probably will be delayed to 2016) could be the most crooked election if it is manipulated by Conservatives.
The RCMP has a strong public image and support. He has now placed more Canadian security investigation under the responsibility of CSIS, an agency controlled by a Conservative minister. This means that anyone can be arrested for any crime and held without trial under power that CSIS is allowed. The reason for arrest can be kept secret. Habeus Corpus is canceled. It means a police state.
He has not got a mandate from the public. The public was never informed of his plans. The past parliamentary elections were not based upon public notification of intentions. Is it democratic?
One can now question Harper’s honesty and integrity and whether his actions are in fact legal. Real investigations have been incomplete due to his interference. If the next election became crooked Harper would not allow the Conservatives to be investigate
13. RELIGION In general religions are not democratic nor do they always permit freedom of speech. When religions are responsible for governing they often become less tolerant; the Spanish Inquisition, the Thirty Years War, a conservative Turkey has allowed religious minorities to be persecuted. Totally religious based governments soon become intolerant. Simple things such as evolution and climate warming are not believed so that encourages ignorance. (National Geographic, March 2015) Some interpret holy books saying that people should not limit their reproduction and encourage more and more populating of the earth. But of greater concern is The Economist’s description March 7, 2015, p25., that some, “nuclear powers are more risk averse,” and there is “a wariness of leaders who feel their regimes to be… under threat… whose religion or ideology embraces apocalyptic confrontation” (Armageddon) as seems to be the case with ISIS and perhaps with Harper. That is such extremists would not hesitate to use nuclar weapons if they had them. Consequently Harper’s reckless involvement in Iraq and Ukraine, which now has cost one Canadian life and perhaps because it plays out internationally will cost much more, is a horrible idea. DID GOD WANT HIS EARTH DESTROYED?

D. THE OVERLALL CONDITIONS FOR REMEDIATION
1.The independence of the electoral commissioner must be reinstated or if not could Harper be investigated for possible subversive behavior even though he is using Parliament and the Senate. These changes must be submitted to the electorate for decision.
2. Harper has , “pushed through omnibus bills ….with little or no debate.”… “AMENDED 60 LAWS, REPEALED 6, AND ADDED THREE MORE.” (Harris p.421.) Many without deabte. It all omnibus bills should be repealed.
3. The Huffington Post has researched and shown Harper to be a member of an extremist evangelical group. Harper sees himself as the right hand of supreme religious righteousness. All his moves correlate with that. He feels he has religious right to do what he has done. Does this sound familiar? Is he is trying to set up a theocracy with himself as head and not responsible to any one – thus his fight with the supreme court. His approach is very much similar to that in Iran in form but his policies and actions on fossil fuels are incurring damages like Isis.
4. Harper is an extreme hypocrite and is dangerous to democracy. Extreme religion sees no benefit in science. Harper uses science based aircraft, cars, home heating and cooling, electronic communication but then has destroyed seven or more scientific libraries, closed the freshwater lakes research center east of Kenora (Party of One) and scientists are afraid to speak out or they could lose their grants. He has reduced grants to science and set back Canada by 50 years by destroying science programs. Research must be rebuilt.
5. He has strongly supported fossil fuels companies because he saw a great opportunity to gain financial support from them. If he is appointed to oil company boards after his term is up he will be remunerated handsomely. Media do not report the damages done by the fossil fuels companies because oil companies control profitable advertising and have shareholding controls. Many of the climate warming events have created terrible catastrophes. The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is the only one that has made a small incomplete effort to repair its damages. Otherwise the taxpayer is always on the hook for fossil fuel companies costs. The Philippine typhoon 10,000 dead, hurricane Sandy 57 dead and 50 billion dollars in costs, the European heat wave 2003, 30,000 dead, the Burma Hurricane Naga 138,000 dead. The IPCC Fifth study proved with 95% statistical accuracy that climate warming is a human caused event from burning fossil fuels and releasing carbon dioxide. In science 95% is basically absolute. The carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming. In part measures were taken on land and also ocean temperature increases shown by thermometers floating in the oceans and at depth. Dr. Stanford and others have shown how climate is modified. Greater evaporation and formation of rivers in the sky caused deluges of rain in Alberta floods killing a few for a total of 51 deaths from fossil fuels in Canada. The speeding up of ice cap melting has been measured by Dr. Barber U. of Manitoba. Other measures include, “Thinning of ice in central Arctic by 65% between 1975 and 2012. .. 36% reduction in thickness between 1975 and 2000.” (Arctic Cryosphere, University of Washington, ENN March 3, 2015). Fossil fuels burning must stop and CO2 re sequestered in wells not fracked.
6. DEATH RATES. The United Nations Environmental Program has stated that 250,000 die each year from climate change events. (Time, April 2010) the Dana Group says 400,000 die each year from climate change. More recently The Economist reported that four million die each year from fossil fuels, “Coal also kills a lot of people. Outdoor air pollution largely from coal though also from cars and other industry, kills four million people a year, more than any infectious disease, in so doing has huge economic effects”. These are facts from the Better Growth Better Climate report, ( written by 4 former presidents or PMs , 2 Nobel economics laureates, World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank). (The Economist, Sept. 20, 2014. P. 23-24) Harper has exclusively supported the fossil fuel companies. The true cost of gas USF is $6.25 pg and diesel $7.72 pg. (Drew Shindell, Duke U. ). About $2.00 per liter Canadian but likely all costs are not in. Harper with his unthinking total support of the fossil fuel companies has policies that seem complicit in these global death rates. Just as the Thorpe RCMP jailed the man that handed the gun to the man that killed the four RCMP officers, Harper has handed the means to the fossil uels companies. So we have it Harper exclusively supports the fossil fuel companies: Those companies are largely responsible (they mislead people about being green.) for climate warming. Climate warming causes disasters that kill about one million children each year but the bible says “suffer little children to come unto me.” Is there a satanic influence to these extremist views? One cannot contribute to killing children and claim one is a Christian.
We need to impose law for killing or complicit in the act and for reimbursing costs caused.
7. Law Harper has attacked the supreme court because it overruled him. He sees himself as the supreme decision maker. He has now redesigned criminal law, “CONSERVATIVES MOVE TO GIVE JURIES A SAY” This means juries can make a recommendation to the Judge but under this law, “ a marked departure from Canadian sentencing,“ .. “asking juries to answer specific questions” and …” provides a review by the public safety minister ….the minister may conduct the review on his own.“… “ who makes a recommendation to cabinet, which is responsible for the ultimate decision .” (the Globe and Mail, March 12 , 2015.) The sentence is the power over conviction.. The cabinet knows little about law and power is taken away form the judge who is the specialist in law, thus weakening our legal system but gives Harper the power via the control he has over his ministers in cabinet, which now appears absolute like a dictator. Thus seriously undermining our legal system. Politics overrides the legal system. This is hugely destructive. The senate and legal system are now controlled by the PM leaving no means to reign in the authority and dictatorship of one person, the PM. This dictatorship must be reversed. 8. Managing a Dictatorial Government This is the bandwagon Harper is on. His extreme religious views he thinks
makes it all right. Recently Harper has sent Canadian Aircraft to fight in a very real fire fight in Syria. In his view he is fighting Armageddon, the final battle of good over evil and will be rewarded with a go-to-heaven card. These aircraft were not requested and we would have been better of playing the peace card. All groups say this Syrian war will never be won militarily. But this increased military participation gets reaction from ISIS and now allows Harper to play his “fear mongering” card for election time. (Fear based leaflets have already come out of the Conservative offices in a voting district in Manitoba) and it will be used to justify and remove more rights from Canadians, now in process. Now since he has already ceded some investigation rights to CSIS, and recently given more power to CSIS to hold people longer, he is in fact giving himself more power. All is set to transform Canada into a republic. Much has been put on line about the so called benefits of a republic. It will actually be much less democratic. The next step will be to allow any group to donate any amount of money (A simple act in a majority government) to any party they wish. An evangelical Christian actually said only evangelicals should hold seats in Parliament. Since unlimited use of the media controls most peoples thinking Harper will have set himself up as permanent PM of a Theocracy managed by CSIS police soon under direction to become less tolerant. This must be reversed.

CONCLUSIONS
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.
He is ensured that he:
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
Lack of freedom of speech has gone a way too far. His huge changes were never on his proposed electoral agenda. If he has not acted in the best interests of Canadians what is he up to? Why is this man still here? He has disrespected all the covenants Diefenbaker held dear. His actions threaten Canadian democracy. He has seen to it that republicanism is favorably discussed on line especially for religious organizations. Totally religious governments usually become dictatorial.
I am afraid there is little time as Harper will use his majority in Parliament to turn Canada into a religious dictatorship run as a republic by an undemocraticaly appointed electoral college. Religious extremism
knows no bounds. Only Canadians can make this decision as we have freedom of speech. We need a referendum or plebiscite. The people own parliament.
Harper through controlling – elected members of parliament voices in Parliament, – the senate – as well as increasing security laws and – limiting our civil rights and – placing the Electoral Commissioner under his control, controls crime sentencing and has increasingly set us up for a dictatorial theocracy government.
I hope I am wrong but all the evidence points to Harper’s subversively undercutting the peoples choice of government. Is he a traitor to his own election promises?
Please pass this on and demonstrate May first before Harper makes more controlling laws. We need an on line plebiscite or referendum to ask what Canadian’s want. We have to remember Harper had no mandate to make such significant changes. Canada is not now a democracy. Just through Harper’s eyes.. We need a plebiscite or referendum. Harper had no public electoral support to make these changes.
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CHARTER WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH,THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED AGAINST THESE RIGHTS. climatedisaster.com
References: The Huffington Post; The Party of One, Michael Harris; After this Everything Changes, Naomi Kline; Kill the Messengers, Mark Bourrie. National Geographic. Bouroughs Climate Warming., The Globe and Mail.
Referendum Yes No
1. PM Harper must resign _____ _____
2. All Harper omnibus bills should be repealed _____ _____
3. All Harper bills changing power controls in
government must be repealed _____ _____

Harper as Dictator and Controls on People

Posted by Willard Anderson on March 29th, 2015.

HARPER AS DICTATOR
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.

PM Harper has ensured that he:
Controls the elected members of his party.
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Wants to change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.

References: Eeric Gottardi Cdn Bar re “Violation of the Charter”, Harris, One Man Party. Kline After This Everything Changes.

Bob Rae, “I find Harper to be the most deeply partisan and divisive person in Canadian History.”

Farley Mowat “ S. Harper is probably the most dangerous human being elected to power in Canada.”

A student of German history described Harper’s methods for taking over government as similar to Hitlers in his early days.

Under Harper we are no longer a democracy.

climatedisaster.com

Charlie and Loss of Democracy In Canada

Posted by Willard Anderson on January 21st, 2015.


Winnipeg Free Press

You discuss Freedom of Speech with respect to Charlie. I firmly believe that this is a fundamental right and we should not shrink from expressing our views. The hazard is that other rights like democracy have already been or will be eroded (Party of One) by a man who considers himself an extremist version of a messiah. So did Hitler.

How do we measure?
If one asked a Muslim who he/she owes first allegiance to, will it be to their religion or to the Canadian State. It makes me believe if they are as certain about their religion as I am led to believe, that they would choose Sharia law first. They have not denied that. Suddenly the real meaning of disbelievers would become evident. Perhaps every Muslim should reaffirm his/her commitment to Canada first above his/her religion or return to where his/her religion is prevalent. It may be that simple. Ever since Henry VIII we have tried to separate church from state. If we shrink now will it be like the time Hitler came to power. He established a beech head and soon would accept no opposition to his views.
We also know that almost totally religions are not democratic institutions. We know that almost all sects have some serious faults: Mormons in Bountiful, Scientology, Muslims, Roman Catholics. The principle seems to be when you are in power one can impose anything or principle one wants. Hitler did.

In the recent past Muslims asked for Sharia Law in Toronto. In Belgium where they represent almost 50% could it be that Sharia Law will become predominant? If so when the Belgians ask for tolerance to western law will they be given a right to maintain their western views? That is anathema to Muslims. Ask the writer who wrote against the Muslim religion. One test is always would the Muslim country reciprocate with tolerance to western views if they expect their views to be tolerated in western countries? We are appalled by the consequence of Sharia law in the imposition of the lash. That would become mild if we were to have to educate our children here in Sharia Law.

We know that our PM is a member of an extremist Christian sect. He has withdrawn freedom of speech from the CBC putting constraints on the word they use to describe the Tar sands. He has not allowed media to discuss the debt owed by oil companies to victims of fossil fuel caused climate warming. He has prevented the public's elected members from speaking out for the people they voted to represent them in parliament, destroying freedom of speech. He has terribly weakened our democracy as noted by Party of One. We lose one right and then another and the now Muslim terrorist attacks help Harper justify removal of further rights. One of our rights and then the next is soon to go. Harper used omnibus bills (with no debate in Parliament) to place the Electoral Commissioner under the management of a Conservative Minister. This means the Conservatives cannot be prosecuted for robo calls intended to restrict the vote and other dirty tricks.(Party of One) We know that the 2015 election will be the most corrupt election we have ever experienced through conservative malpractice.

Please speak out freely or tomorrow you will be the one who says : when they came for my neighbor I did not speak out, when they came for my uncle I did not speak out, when they came for my children I did not speak out. Now they are coming for me and there is no one to speak out.
I am a Canadian First.

Will Anderson

Litigation for Climate Deaths

Posted by Willard Anderson on December 27th, 2014.

WHY WHY WHY ?? DO WE HELP TO KILL EARTH’S CHILDREN

A time for taking stock for our children’s sakes and to examine legal liability for climate warming deaths. 18 Dec 2014

There is a death rate attached to fossil fuel caused climate change just as there was from cigarette smoking. Not that they could say which pack or brand of any cigarette caused a specific cancer. Regarding climate warming one researcher has verified with 95 % statistical certainty that it is human caused. Vegetation and carbon sequestered during the Carboniferous period over 100,000,000 years formed fossil fuels and at least 50% have been pumped out and burned in 200 years causing CO2 release into the atmosphere 500,000 times faster than the natural rates and that is the obvious cause of climate warming. So fossil fuel producers knowingly have caused warming oceans and thus storms, floods, fires, droughts and mud slides which in turn have caused an increasingly large death rate. Why is that whole story kept so secret? Does our PM not demand in legislation a balanced story for us through the CBC. What are his policies? “Carbon dioxide emissions have risen relentlessly … the fastest in 30 years”.
This high death rate is :
– United Nations Environmental Program (Time, April 2010) 250,000 deaths per year from fossil fuel caused by climate warming.
– The Dana Group says 400,000 deaths per year, and
– a report from “4 ex presidents, 2 Nobel winning economists , the World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank, Better Growth Better Climate” says ,
“Outdoor air pollution, largely from coal though also [CO2] from cars and other industry, kills 4m (million) people a year – more than any infectious disease”. (The Economist, Sept.20, 2014.)
Who pays?

Precedence 1. In Thunder Bay there was a suit against the city for not being prepared for floods
caused by climate warming.
2. In the case of a shooting of 4 BC mounties, the person that handed the killer a gun was also convicted. 3. A killing of a daughter in India by parents, were charged and convicted in Canada. So crimes committed off shore can be prosecuted in Canada. 4. Cigarette companies were fined for causing cancer deaths on a basis of statistical evidence. There was no one to one particular package/brand of cigarettes causing a specific cancer. 5. IPCC report by a Doctorate says he had 95% statistical evidence that climate warming is human caused. Statistical evidence is valid. 6. There is now prosecution for hate mail. 7. We are 100 % solidly immersed in science: our food supplies, houses, heating, cooling, industry, food supplies, farming, transportation, communication, clothes making and on and on. Christianity is based upon, “Suffer little children to come unto me.” Yet there are some religious groups that say they should do nothing about the killing of children. The only answer is extreme hypocrisy or a satanic influence. 8. Royalties are much higher in other jurisdictions -Texas, Norway. 9. Polluter pays is an accepted principle.

Now rates of ice melt and warming is faster than expected.
“Led by geophysicist Beata Csatho, UB associate professor of geology, the research provides what the authors think is the first comprehensive picture of how Greenland’s ice is vanishing. It suggests that current ice sheet modeling studies are too simplistic to accurately predict future sea level rise, and that Greenland may loose ice more rapidly in the near future than previously thought. (University Of Buffalo, ENN, Dec. 2014)
There is no longer any question about the fossil fuels causing storms, tornadoes, floods, mud slides, drought, and wildfire and the deaths. Because of all the deaths those pushing for more fossil fuels must take responsibility. This is the story everywhere. It is worse than we think. It is a global emergency as the BBC reported. But death is something very peculiar. When a 142 school children are murdered in Pakistan we morn and weep and carry on to urge the bombing of Isis to solve the problem. But the 128,000 killed in Burma from a human caused typhoon passes almost as if they were invisible. Perhaps drought in Sao Paulo Brazil is a more relateable problem. “In October … rain was just a third of normal … and if it rains less than half the long term average in the next few months. …the Cantareira reservoir, on which 6.5m people depend ….will dry up by July 2015.” Corrective measures are unlikely to be ready by then due to political ineffectiveness. This will become a very evident death rate relate-able to many places were there is drought. Canada has the same political ineffectiveness due to greed and mythological beliefs at the top. We need impeachment and we need to prosecute.
The media do not report the whole story, but we still have freedom of speech, even though access to this blog was originally interfered with.

To politicians for the children’s sakes.
We need a strong carbon tax now! Or prosecution for the destruction and death.
a)agree b)disagree
1. We need to stop fossil fuel caused climate warming. a) b) 2. We need a political system that responds to this human disaster. a) b) 3. We need a measurable population policy that conforms with what the land supports. a) b)
Your planet depends upon you.
Climatedisaster.com

Developing Solutions to Climate Change.

Posted by Willard Anderson on November 21st, 2014.

GOOD TIMES BAD TIMES 17 Nov 2014
How would you measure humanity at this time on the earth? We generally try to protect children. We think of them as innocents and do our best to care for them. Similarly we tend to look after our elderly. We seek clothing and shelter. But some of our systems are very negative at times. China or Russia may approach this in enrichment for the top ruling class or dictator. We live in systems of greed justification instead of systems of stewardship. I suppose the stock market investing is the epitome of this greed since only those with money can take advantage of it and the more money the better the success.
Also in the west we live in an age of excess. We have TV programs encouraging a form of gluttony. All foods are considered more acceptable and we eat as much as we can, causing out of control obesity.
We like to be artistic. The work of the classical artists seems to have degraded into extreme abstraction with high prices, measured by name rather than quality. Abstract terms are used to describe it that have no meaning to most people. We run large gas guzzling cars despite all the warnings about fossil fuels and climate warming destruction. We are able to buy intricately made garments festooned with sequins and other time demanding g seamstress construction techniques. These clothes made in the west would cost perhaps $150. but poor countries with wages of maybe 25 cents per hour and sweatshop conditions the clothes are cheap. Really it is a system of encouraging continuous poverty with a race to the bottom driven by free trade and globalization. Our systems are devoid of ethics or morality, disregard the human and environmental conditions. At the same time our wildlife is diminishing in population numbers and projections of extinctions this century are around 50%. While the climate warming conditions are causing some of that extinction, toxic substances we dump, habitat loss from over harvest and hunting are having disastrous impacts.
There are simply too many people for the earth to now sustain. But many religions say that we are to populate the earth. The bible or Qur’an do not say, “populate the earth until one destroys what was Gods work”. It seems that if religion is the factor of management, then there are satanic forces at work. Certainly the rape and killing of innocents is a madman’s work. But there needs to be strong and ethical measures to reduce the whole population of the earth. This is quite possible and can be achieved in a human and equitable way.
We need to evolve and advance our processes and tools we use whether stock markets, chemicals or gratuitous harvesting that needs to be reduced drastically. We are a species on the rampage with no morality, no ethics and no self control.
Where do you want humanity and the earth to be in the near future? With the processes at hand it seems we are heading for super catastrophe.
The main barriers to positive change:
- Unmitigated capitalism and free trade.
- It is a mistake to follow the miss-interpretation of religious books written hundreds of years ago, at a time when the writers did not have the knowledge of how the world’s biological and physical systems worked. Yet religious dogmas dictated a way of treating the earth that has been cataclysmic, pushing especially over population and over consumption.
- A marketplace that focuses on selling and not on achievement, efficiency and fulfillment.
- The world has very irregular educational systems. While there is no divergence from the way the world really works few countries have the capability to place this new knowledge in a fair way in the brains of the young people as well as in with power.-
- There is a personal view that if others have some wealth then I too have the right to do whatever I wish to achieve that same wealth. While there is no question the wealthy nations have to help the under privileged there is now an absolute limit to growth.

Solutions
One has to act. How would you deal with this dilemma? Are you willing to act?
One has to ask :
Where are the systems in business that determine how much we can take from the living earth? We are already past the point of ecological sustainability and this means the rich have to turn over wealth to help the poor. Conditions must be that we all will work to maintain and apply ecological sustainability. What needs to change in our systems?
How can we make that change?
What can I do right now to contribute to positive action?
Pick a problem.
Discuss with ecological experts.
Develop a small solution.
Communicate with others locally and internationally
Coordinate with crowds
ACT

Remember …………….
The physical makeup and processes of the earth determine earth biology. Earth biology determines what plants and animals live and evolve. Only then peoples education, medicine and ability to distribute wealth fairly fine tunes our lives.

Creating Policies We Are Comfortable With

Posted by Willard Anderson on November 12th, 2014.

COMFORT WITH POLICIES 8 NOV 2014
We are creature of habit. Perhaps all animals are. We like to know what our circumstances are or what they will be tomorrow. We like to know we have a place to sleep, even animals make a burrow. We like to know we have something for breakfast, something to eat later in the day. We depend upon getting to this condition by exploring our technologies and applying them to make things easier. To make things more accessible. But trouble comes when others take our processes or technologies and perhaps even do one better so they can apply them and perhaps even take some of what would satisfy our needs and convenience away from us, sometimes making things much more difficult us. Our processes have been delineated by freedom of speech and democratic choice. That is a free press and to be able e to access the press or now the internet. Democratic choice is built upon the Icelandic and British systems.
We now have a surreptitious government controlled not by democratic choice but rather controlled by a number of default legislative bills that have taken those freedoms away from us.
1. We have lobby groups that have huge access to ministers to influence them with money or future benefits in order to give private companies their way. For there to be fairness there should be a clear one to one relationship in the ability to donate to a campaign and to vote. Otherwise it biases elections. If business has the right to lobby then all individuals should have the same access paid for by the government, or, lobbying should be terminated.
2. The government has given companies have the same rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as people. The Charter was intended only to be a document relative to people. We need now to have every city and province to pass bills to take the Charter rights away from corporations. Some jurisdictions have done a comparable thing in the USA. These Charter rights expropriate an undue amount of wealth and power to corporations which are just constructs to direct wealth to certain people.
3. As well during elections there should be no funding from corporations at all. To be fair the donations and right to vote need to be in a one to one balance. The election is designed for people to make their choice. Corporations have no right to be benefactors when real workers suffer losses in the process.
4. During the fifties and sixties there was pretty much a free press and there were many independent news papers. Today large companies have bought up independent newspapers, furthermore owners such as Izzy Asper had fired many of his staff because they did not hold the same philosophy as the owner. Then the owner insisted on writing the editorials himself, thus abrogating the right of freedom of the press and ceding it only to a collective who hold all those newspapers in one large corporation. So today most newspapers are right wing and the center or left wing philosophy is seldom heard.
5. In addition the federal government now works to destroy unions and has pushed a large amount of the created wealth to the owners of industries and the workers now get an extremely small share that has not increased significantly since the 1970′s. Meanwhile the top 10 % of society get most of the financial benefit. One needs taxation to be fair and the workers have to have a voice in negotiating salaries. Again they need a free voice.
6. Surely the tax payer should not be subsidizing fossil fuel companies with such a long history of high profits and such a history of high death rates from climate warming. The fossil fuel
companies should now be paying all costs of production including the costs of deaths.
The USA is a guiding and an extreme example. The processes in the USA have led to a paralyzed government, supported strongly by a Christian extremist racist right wing view and this has caused things like education and health to have suffered badly. A country without a decent educational system will devolve into dictatorship, because opinions are primarily those of the wealthiest and strongest but there is no longer a free press venue for the middle class or workers opinions.
When one has a leader like Harper (an extremist evangelical says the Huffington post) who would like to be the only spokesman for Canadians, you are moving toward religious dictatorship not unlike the extremist Muslims in Iran. For example Harper’s policies contribute to high death rates from global warming because his strategy is only to pursue power. He releases political gifts to improve his own image from time to time. He does not care about Canadians since his motivations are strictly religious motivations and those of self concern. A) Power and B) money.
There is a pattern emerging which we see more evidently in the USA. When Bush Jr. left office he left the USA with about a 11 trillion dollar debt. This very much limited the abilities of the next president. The public lost homes and retirement funds. The Banks were never tried in court though they sold mortgages that had no value. The government bailed out the banks which put the money to work enticing the big corporations to create work, up to 11 trillion dollars? Where did it go?
The public never had all of the information. Knowledge was manufactured for public consumption. The matter of a free choice during elections was controlled by manufactured or threatening information, threatening to the average person who then was only in possession of the manufactured story. The story was in the control of a few large corporations – owners of the media, so
it was very easy to communicate to the unwary and to a misinformed public. So it is today!
C )Control of information. Dionne was attacked by the conservatives and there was a false story fed to the public. Though he would have been the far better PM for Canada as he had Canadian’s welfare at heart, the false stories to the public made it impossible for Dionne to win. (Manufacturing Consent, Chomsky)The conservatives had control of the manufactured story. But people like Dr. Hansen and many climatologists knew the real story. But as the war on science began scientists were afraid to speak out because they would loose their grants. The true story about fossil fuel caused climate warming was never presented.
Now we have a government that has created the largest national debt Canada has ever had. We are led into a war where our aircraft were not called for and the USA just put 1500 trainers into the war that could have been Canadian. Comment was made that the few Canadian aircraft would make little difference. In fact their target was first a pickup truck, while the USA bombed the meeting sites where the leader of ISIS was to be and it is now suggested he was seriously injured. Canadian security has recently come under cyber attack by some foreign state so it is doubtful that Canadian attack targets could remain secure. Yet Harper is undercutting and closing down science libraries that could have helped us. In addition the PM refuses to meet with the premiers.
Now remember that it is the lack of an educational system that separates democracy from dictatorship. We ask which direction is our present PM leading us? (See earlier posts)
As well the PM realizes he has an image problem so as a strategist he sets up a program to help women with children. A sure sympathy getter — If — one does not remember all the damage and death he has helped to impose globally on children growing up today.

Our policies should reflect how we want to deal with this huge problem. OR WHAT MORE IMPORTANT PROBLEMS ARE WE DEALING WITH?

The voter should control money, power and freedom of information. HARPER HAS IMPOSED A GREAT DEAL OF POLICIES THAT WERE NOT IN HIS ELECTORAL PLATFORM.

Climatedisaster.com

Climate disaster principles , barriers , solutions.

Posted by Willard Anderson on October 24th, 2014.

THINK COMMUNICATE!
THE PRINCIPLES OF UNDERSTANDING FOSSIL FUEL CAUSED CLIMATE WARMING.
1 st Principle: Vegetation during 100,000,000 years of the carboniferous period sequestered vast amounts of CO2 creating the current natural gas, petroleum, coal and tar sands fuels. We burned perhaps half of those fuels in one hundred years , or one million times faster than natural rates and that created global warming.
Principle Two: IPCC fifth report – humans are responsible for climate warming by burning fossil fuels 24 -7 for a century and releasing vast amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere.
Principle three: The CO2 in the atmosphere is now greater than any it has been for the past 800,000 years.
Principle four: After heightening of CO2 in the atmosphere there were past extinction events. Principle five: The CO2 causes an upset of climate creating many weather disasters and killing millions of people.
Principle six: The climate disasters have caused a trillion dollars in costs to our economies global wide and if no action is taken the costs will equal the global GDP by the end of the century, making business as usual far more expensive than all the actions we take to solve the climate warming problem and converting to green renewable energy.
Principle seven: This process in the past has included the addition of CO 2 to the oceans making them more acidic causes oxygenation of dead plant and animal material releasing vast amounts of gaseous sulfur compounds killing off animal life on the continents.
Principle eight: When the four mounties were shot in BC the persons handing the killer his weapon were also convicted.
Principle nine: A young Canadian woman was murdered in India by her parents. They were tried and convicted in Canada even though the murder took place in India. Crimes in other countries can be tried in Canada.

IMPACTS The Dana Group, UNEP and others state that there have been one million deaths per year from fossil fuel caused climate warming. The report Better Growth Better Climate was written by “people from all the main financial institutions (such as the World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank) who know what presidents and finance ministers think is important” and the author(s) states, “outdoor air pollution, largely from coal though also from cars and other industry, kills 4 million people a year, more than any infectious disease, and in so doing has huge economic effects.” (The Economist, Sept. 20, 2014, p. 24) Fossil fuels and climate warming have killed 51 Canadians, plus near misses in Winnipeg and your taxes have increased paying for fossil fuel created weather disaster and relief. In this context we have to ask what should the penalties be for encouraging fossil fuel climate warming with all its death rates be, compared to penalties for hate mail and murder. Should we not be prosecuting anyone expanding fossil fuel use or those pushing policies that support fossil fuel use. Is that not the same or worse than hate mail? Think about the perhaps half million children that have died from fossil fuel use. Whose side are you on? It took 40 years to prosecute cigarette companies for encouraging cigarette smoking that killed many people.

THE OIL COMPANIES ARE THE PROBLEM. But the barriers to solutions are : mass media, educational curriculum, religion, politicians and selective application of Canada’s laws.

Harper is the senior POLITICAN but is also a member of an extremist religious evangelical group (Huffington Post). He does not allow members you have elected to actually speak in parliament reducing freedom of speech. One member of his group said only evangelicals should be allowed to hold seats in Parliament and he sent fighter planes to the mid east the first time because he wants to be in Armageddon, the final battle between good and evil so he would go direct to heaven. (The Armageddon Factor) He attacked the supreme court because he wanted to be the only one to speak for the nation to pass on his extremist religious views. He protected Mulroney limiting investigation into the air bus affair. Put a gag order on the CBC (the ombudsmen would not deny this.) He wanted to stop the CBC from informing the public how dangerous fossil fuel caused climate warming has become. . He has done much damage to the fabric of Canada, and we wonder where we would be if Pearson were in his place.

RELIGIOUS institutions we expect would abhor violence but we have found even those one would expect to have the best of values make mistakes. They should be required to reform or be penalized. It is not perosnal beliefs but the institutions that are at fault.
Values such as “Suffer little children or thou shalt not kill” are important. A lot of recent news stories have referenced religious abuse: of young girls in Bountiful, the ability of Scientology to control free speech and free movement, the priests of the a church abusing children and then being protected by the current and former two popes (Secrets of the Vatican), the violence of extremist Muslims that many say is supported under verses in the Qur’an. Do we insist on being politically correct about freedom of religion even if a part of their message is violence. Does someone imposing violence upon others under religious freedom have the right to freedom of speech to pursue these criminal acts. Not according to our hate propaganda laws! When see hate mail being sent out with the purpose of hurting people. According to Canadian Laws are we not required to sanction them and impose punishment? Our law requires strong penalty for people espousing hate propaganda, up to two years prison sentence or up to $10,000. fine. Crime is crime. Now when we hear about the extreme actions that Isis takes we should not worry about their religious rights. They seem to have abrogated their religious rights by viciously killing innocents. Mind you politicians and corporations have killed innocent people as well. But the scale and viciousness seems to go beyond everything else. At the core of this is that they carry out crimes on the basis of a belief system. In the case of all the worlds religious books whether written one hundred years ago or two thousand they are written upon beliefs. There was little knowledge about the hard facts of how the worlds bio-physical properties behaved and these holy books did not have scientifically based facts. Now we know much more.

We expect the MEDIA to report to the public on the basis of facts and acts, not upon what they believe. We do not say we believe our house exists. We say we know it is there, we can measure it, feel it, it gives us shelter from the rain. The problem we have today is that the media do not report the whole story, they take it out of context so people cannot see how things work. The media has to separate facts from beliefs and tell the whole factual details and how they are interwoven. People should know something about how the world’s climate works. It is absolutely essential. But today we have no support from the mass media to report on climate crimes. People do not even understand that one odd ball year does not in itself establish a pattern. But climate data has been established over a century and now much longer. All our governments required scientists to report on climate studies and they have done so in the Fifth Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. On line one can read the true facts about climate, but the media seldom reference it, despite it is far and above the most important event of our times, more so than wars or Ebola. Man made climate disasters have killed millions. The data is out. But the media still close their eyes. Funny how the media do not investigate climate caused disasters. Could it be because they are beholden to the petroleum corporations whose advertising the media do not want to loose? Should companies not responsible to the public hold media transmission or wave band licenses? Young peoples futures are being sacrificed for corporate profits.

EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM is of course controlled by politicians. It seems however that the more altruistic behaviors of teachers are not operational, they are asleep at the switch. Does not their concern for their students override all other fundamental problem for students today? Fossil fuel caused climate warming is such a problem. It has killed millions and costs trillions. It is way out of scale of today’s limited small details. It is a big story. But as the biggest story it is mandatory that it be dealt with thoroughly in the curriculum. Students need the tools from their educational experiences to be able to handle the problems they have now inherited. Their futures depend upon a more thorough response to climate warming. Even worse it is time constrained. Science says that if we do not deal with it in the next two years we will not be able to control warming. The hazard is beyond the average understanding without education and knowledge about the details of how it happened and how we can solve this problem. But it needs to be done now. Ask Drs. Suzuki, Mitchell, Hansen, Barber, Roberts or authors Dyer, Klein or any reputable climatologist.

THE SOLUTIONS
School curriculum reports to provide data for the young to develop their own life stories upon. Today fossil fuel caused climate warming is the most important part of their stories. Today their taxes are higher becase of disaster relief payments for man made storm events. Theire lives are impacted now. But there is next to nothing in the school about the longer story of how fossil fuel caused climate change is impacting them. They have no tools provided through the public school curriculum so young people do not know how to delve into complex problems about climate disasters that impacts them (their taxes are now higher) and that urgently need solutions. Their futures are at stake. Now we need to prosecute!
We need to initiate a class action suit against government, an accord to an agreed upon target to return CO2 ppm back to below preindustrial times and to stop spending more money on pushing fossil fuels rather than upon developing green sustainable energy. Prosecute those not taking CO2 out of the atmosphere at a rate agreed upon to bring CO2 ppm below 300 ppm in the atmosphere. We have more CO2 in the atmosphere than there has been for about 800,000 years and along with that amount of CO2 in the past have come massive global extinctions. Do you think this is serious? Do you think the media and the educational system should be keeping everyone well informed. Should electronic media have licenses if they do not keep people informed. Can you ever see the broadcast media saying, “No I will not broadcast that a hurricane is imminent regardless of how many people are at risk.” Can you see religious institutions saying, “We can’t help, that hurricane is god’s will and we must not lift a hand to help?” Unless of course the institutions are satanist groups.

The ANSWERS are:
Write letters asking Harper to resign.
Start creating real jobs initiating a green energy supported economy.
Punish the perpetrators pushing more CO2 into the atmosphere while not creating green options.
Insist upon a national hydro energy grid and electric railways Canada wide.
Be certain that schools have a curriculum that teaches the whole story .
Penalize media for posting hate propaganda and not including the true story about fossil fuels .
Communicate world wide.
Ask for green building codes.
Persue actions to take CO2 out of the atmosphere.
Do crowd sourcing on the internet for your actions.

Wildlife Destruction and Harper Update Sep. 21, 2014

Posted by Willard Anderson on September 21st, 2014.

Blog Summary 24 Aug 2014

WILDLIFE DECLINE IN PARKS.
In March 1973 I started work with Manitoba Parks as their Chief Parks Naturalist with responsibility for their education interpretive program province wide. In following years I traveled very widely in Manitoba. As I drove to Duck Mountains Provincial Park I used to count road kills. In later years I then repeated that habit. I found today there are many fewer road kills. There are more cars driving faster so what is happening is that there are many fewer animals, except for geese and whitetail deer.
In traveling to Hecla I had found a nice stand of blue flag or wild iris in a wet circular area about 20 m in diameter. Then they put the road in so the stand was wiped out. This in part defined the administration. They seldom spent money on protection but totally emphasized harvest and recreation. The early director was coerced into continuing harvest in the parks in order to get them dedicated. This continues to this day with hunting and trapping still going on in almost all parks. In addition the whitetail or Virginia deer carries s brain worm but it does not kill the animal. It does infect and kill other ungulates. Highest infection is in eastern Manitoba. It is peculiar that the whitetail deer are totally protected in the Whiteshell while moose have been hunted almost to extirpation in the park. This makes no sense. As well the hunting group have access to almost the whole of Manitoba excluding posted land. This is a shame since one seldom sees animals in provincial Parks as occurs in Riding Mountain National Park. But that is too far for many to travel to. Hecla had a ban on moose hunting for five years and it was common to see moose in the marsh near the entrance. When they reopened hunting, populations dropped form over two hundred animals to less than fifty. One seldom sees moose today. Staff were generally not professionally responsible and their ethics seemed to agree that harvest was important. After all park visitors don’t miss what they have never seen.

In Winnipeg I have noticed the loss of Northern oriole from the southern part of Winnipeg. Also robins used to come in hoard to eat the berries off the Mountain Ash trees. The robins numbers have seriously dropped off. There is wide loss of wildlife. I spoke individually to the Director of Parks and Director of Wildlife. Both agreed that there should be some parks where wildlife is protected. I have passed this on to the Minister responsible. The problem of less viability of ecosystems is widespread. We need to act on such problems.
Please write the minister.

THE EBOLA – PUTIN – HARPER COMPLEXITY

The anti Ebola drug, mostly invented in Winnipeg, which seems to have some impact, Harper has given away supposedly to health workers in Africa. While this is laudable the disease spreads ever more widely. It is probably just a matter of time before there are cases in Canada. Then the excuse will be we cannot produce the drug fast enough. What is the strategy? Harper’s seems to be a religious one.
With Ebola today, it is strange that Canada seems to have no airport traveler control strategy, no long term plan even after the SARS epidemic experience. There is a lack of logic here. This is not unlike sending our air force to the middle east while supporting Ukraine. Mean while Putin knows if Obama intervenes in Ukraine he then has justification to move into the Canadian Arctic to grab oil. He is building up troops in the Russian arctic and Canada’s air force is no where to be seen in our arctic. What is our PM doing?

We have been told by Huffington Post that Harper is member of an extremist evangelical group. It seems all of Harper’s actions fit this evangelical extremism philosophy. (See earlier posts.) We have a PM who is doing much damage to Canada. He takes $13 billion out of the transfer payments for health care in order to run his election campaign with cash gifts where he deems appropriate.
He takes money away from volunteer agencies and redirects it to the evangelical movement. Iran is a theist country run by priests and Harper is trying to follow the Iranian model so he fought against the power of the supreme court. He thought he should have that power. We have to remember one of the members from the evangelical group said only evangelical members should be allowed to hold seats in Parliament, (The Armageddon Factor) the Iranian model!
Good luck for the future!

Climatedisaster.com

Receive Updates

About

Climate Disaster is a site dedicated to bringing up the ignored environmental issues that are affecting the planet.

Read more on the about page

Archives