Economic Model Kills Children

Posted by Willard Anderson on August 27th, 2015.

THE WORLD IS OUR MODEL. 2015 AUG 26

If we take a little boy called Jack who has a rich imagination and he sees a picture in his mind. It is perhaps Tom Thumb or Thimblelena or an old story time character or any fairy tale hero. He loves this little story, this little myth, but it is strictly in the world of imagination. It has no real world presence. But it has a big impact on the little boys feelings. So when Harry comes along and says will Jack trade his lunch for a little mannikin toy, that looks like it could be the creature of Jack’s dream, then Jack being a little boy is too ready to accept. So for very many days the other little boy John brings along a toy that Jack perceives as part of his hero’s life, and Harry keeps bringing to the believer things he says are an extension of this little dream. The dreamer Jack thus gives away his lunch for many days and weeks and he is beginning to feel not so energetic at school and can’t remember so well. Now the dream has a real world impact. It is no longer just imaginary.

Now in the real world it some times happens that the death of a child is part of a process that gave large benefits to someone with power. The system does not see connections, it only sees just a harmless entity that will now earn profits. The system with all its regulations, monitoring, policing and jurisprudence does not research into the interdependence in the matter. When there is no motivation and the child cannot represent himself the winners are the people with power. The system only sees the actions of the the people in power because the child has not designed a personal system to protect himself, he does not yet have that capacity. The child is not part of the supposed success building process of the person with power. What is the outcome?

Now some times the benefits of killing children happen indiscriminately but it may be deemed that some segments of society benefit. It may also be accepted that in the dream there is a forgiveness for killing a child. But then the perceived need is so large that the event reoccurs and another child is killed. Is this second event still forgivable? It would seem that it is. So we develop a system of what seems to be great benefits for some but always is connected to the killing of children. The man with power has an encapsulated system that does not see the other let alone try to encompass it in his own model. The child’s system is encapsulated simply because there is no avenue to have an impact upon the other power brokers model.
This means the power broker’s system is always willing to forgive the killing of children. Is this an acceptable format to operate under today. This is a system we use. What is wrong with the system .
1. Nothing so long as some benefit.
2. A lot and the design must be changed.

Which world do you live in ?

Now we clearly have had about 2009, a climate warming event in Naga in Burma that killed 128,000 people. About one third were children. It was a human caused event for which humans are to blame. By any ethics and morality but certainly Christian it was criminal – “ suffer little children, and thou shalt not kill”. As well in the Popes Encyclical Laudato Si items 3 and 8, we have no right to kill other species off – It is a sin. Even BP felt they had a large responsibility so they paid off humans but neglected nature as addressed in the Pope’s encyclical Laudato Si.

The little story of John and Harry gets played out in the real world on larger scale today. But this dream and reality get mixed together in the way we behave today. In John Kay’s book Other people’s Money he says, ” A country can only be prosperous if it has a well functioning financial system.” By this he means
“extend credit and capital, manage savings, deal with economic risks.” (p69 The Economist, Aug 22, 2015.) There are a few principles that are a problem
1. He says high risk stock trading “persuing short term profits which may cause losses” while the “costs of their mistakes will be borne by taxpayers,” which in Jack’s real world is John’s loss of food.
2. He says referring to the 07-09 financial collapse “people who traded mortgage backed securities new about securities but little about mortgages” p 69 (sometimes intentionally) and the problem is inadequate scope of context. The traders knew nothing of the natural environment that suffered so greatly. Because of this inadequate narrow model. Harry does not take Jack’s circumstances into account. Harry just knows a good deal.
3. Then he says those “who handle other peoples money should be held to high standards of customer care ,…. subject to criminal penalties … which should fall on individuals, not corporations, which tend to pass on the costs”.
So it is that our so called economic model destroys the natural environment because it is living in the dream world and does not look at the real world: where the resources came from, how they were acquired and habitat and ecosystem costs in taking those resources. Harper of course repealed all Canada’s environmental protection laws, which on top of an unrealistic economic model made things worse. Those who damage the environment through economic greed must pay the penalty. Climate warming and 128,000 dead is part of the cost.

When the system does not allow Harry to take away John’s sustenance for Harry to make money it will become a better system.

In terms of litigation we know that an Indo-Canadian couple that killed their daughter in India were subjected to Canadian law and penalty. Canadian law was imposed and the parents were jailed. Events carried out for economic purposes in Canada that have consequences elsewhere can be prosecuted. Climate warming is partly caused by Canadian fossil fuels. Those companies should be held partly responsible for the 38,000 children that died in Burma. It is just that the media and our educational systems never report on the connections between fossil fuels, climate warming and the death rates in the same article. It is time to start to prosecute and to change our energy systems fast before we have total earth systems collapse. The ignorance of the media and of education is not acceptable. Their criminal culpablity is real.

climatedisaster.com

harper files

Posted by Willard Anderson on August 18th, 2015.

The Closing of the Canadian Mind
By STEPHEN MARCHEAUG. 14, 2015
Photo

Stephen Harper, the prime minister of Canada, is creating a legacy of secrecy and ignorance. Credit Mark Blinch/Reuters
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
Email
Share
Tweet
Save
More

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

THE prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, has called an election for Oct. 19, but he doesn’t want anyone to talk about it.

He has chosen not to participate in the traditional series of debates on national television, confronting his opponents in quieter, less public venues, like the scholarly Munk Debates and CPAC, Canada’s equivalent of CSPAN. His own campaign events were subject to gag orders until a public outcry forced him to rescind the forced silence of his supporters.

Mr. Harper’s campaign for re-election has so far been utterly consistent with the personality trait that has defined his tenure as prime minister: his peculiar hatred for sharing information.

Americans have traditionally looked to Canada as a liberal haven, with gun control, universal health care and good public education.

But the nine and half years of Mr. Harper’s tenure have seen the slow-motion erosion of that reputation for open, responsible government. His stance has been a know-nothing conservatism, applied broadly and effectively. He has consistently limited the capacity of the public to understand what its government is doing, cloaking himself and his Conservative Party in an entitled secrecy, and the country in ignorance.

His relationship to the press is one of outright hostility. At his notoriously brief news conferences, his handlers vet every journalist, picking and choosing who can ask questions. In the usual give-and-take between press and politicians, the hurly-burly of any healthy democracy, he has simply removed the give.

Mr. Harper’s war against science has been even more damaging to the capacity of Canadians to know what their government is doing. The prime minister’s base of support is Alberta, a western province financially dependent on the oil industry, and he has been dedicated to protecting petrochemical companies from having their feelings hurt by any inconvenient research.

In 2012, he tried to defund government research centers in the High Arctic, and placed Canadian environmental scientists under gag orders. That year, National Research Council members were barred from discussing their work on snowfall with the media. Scientists for the governmental agency Environment Canada, under threat of losing their jobs, have been banned from discussing their research without political approval. Mentions of federal climate change research in the Canadian press have dropped 80 percent. The union that represents federal scientists and other professionals has, for the first time in its history, abandoned neutrality to campaign against Mr. Harper.

His active promotion of ignorance extends into the functions of government itself. Most shockingly, he ended the mandatory long-form census, a decision protested by nearly 500 organizations in Canada, including the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Canadian Catholic Council of Bishops. In the age of information, he has stripped Canada of its capacity to gather information about itself. The Harper years have seen a subtle darkening of Canadian life.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story
Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

The darkness has resulted, organically, in one of the most scandal-plagued administrations in Canadian history. Mr. Harper’s tenure coincided with the scandal of Rob Ford, the mayor of Toronto who admitted to smoking crack while in office and whose secret life came to light only when Gawker, an American website, broke the story. In a famous video at a Ford family barbecue, Mr. Harper praised the Fords as a “Conservative political dynasty.”

Mr. Harper’s appointments to the Senate — which in Canada is a mercifully impotent body employed strictly for political payoffs — have proved greedier than the norm. Mr. Harper’s chief of staff was forced out for paying off a senator who fudged his expenses. The Mounties have pressed criminal charges.

Continue reading the main story
RECENT COMMENTS

em 5 hours ago
The tainted judges scandal will bring him down if journalists or the opposition parties start asking questions.Why did the PM and his…
Kevin Wilson 2 days ago
Part of the problem is that the middle-left assumes that all people are concerned about the erosion of democracy and when presented with…
YC Lee 2 days ago
Few Canadian voters are ever in total agreement with a party’s (any party’s) platform. Therefore in our democracy, the voter has two…
SEE ALL COMMENTS
After the 2011 election, a Conservative staffer, Michael Sona, was convicted of using robocalls to send voters to the wrong polling places in Guelph, Ontario. In the words of the judge, he was guilty of “callous and blatant disregard for the right of people to vote.” In advance of this election, instead of such petty ploys, the Canadian Conservatives have passed the Fair Elections Act, a law with a classically Orwellian title, which not only needlessly tightens the requirements for voting but also has restricted the chief executive of Elections Canada from promoting the act of voting. Mr. Harper seems to think that his job is to prevent democracy.

But the worst of the Harper years is that all this secrecy and informational control have been at the service of no larger vision for the country. The policies that he has undertaken have been negligible — more irritating distractions than substantial changes. He is “tough on crime,” and so he has built more prisons at great expense at the exact moment when even American conservatives have realized that over-incarceration causes more problems than it solves. Then there is a new law that allows the government to revoke citizenship for dual citizens convicted of terrorism or high treason — effectively creating levels of Canadianness and problems where none existed.

For a man who insists on such intense control, the prime minister has not managed to control much that matters. The argument for all this secrecy was a technocratic impulse — he imagined Canada as a kind of Singapore, only more polite and rule abiding.

The major foreign policy goal of his tenure was the Keystone Pipeline, which Mr. Harper ultimately failed to deliver. The Canadian dollar has returned to the low levels that once earned it the title of the northern peso. Despite being left in a luxurious position of strength after the global recession, he coasted on what he knew: oil. In the run-up to the election, the Bank of Canada has announced that Canada just had two straight quarters of contraction — the technical definition of a recession. He has been a poor manager by any metric.

The early polls show Mr. Harper trailing, but he’s beaten bad polls before. He has been prime minister for nearly a decade for a reason: He promised a steady and quiet life, undisturbed by painful facts. The Harper years have not been terrible; they’ve just been bland and purposeless. Mr. Harper represents the politics of willful ignorance. It has its attractions.

Whether or not he loses, he will leave Canada more ignorant than he found it. The real question for the coming election is a simple but grand one: Do Canadians like their country like that?

HARPER’S ACTIONS ARE A CAREFULLY DESIGNED PLAN

Posted by Willard Anderson on August 17th, 2015.

WHY DO WE DO WHAT WE DO? HARPER’S ACTIONS HAVE A DESIGN

Everyone does things for a reason. Because they like the thing they are acting for. Perhaps for spite, for other emotional reasons, love, hate, for food and sustenance, for joy, or to achieve an end, that may be for mankind’s good or for personal reasons. In the case of our Prime Minister we have to ask , “Why did he do certain things?” You be the judge.

1. In the “air bus” affair in writing his terms of reference for an inquiry why did Harper separate or – why did he insist on not allowing the money in the paper bag (HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS) from being associated with the air bus affair?
2. Why has he decided to kill medicare when the people want it? Why has he reduced federal financial support from 50% to 10%
3. Why has he prepared omnibus bills to hide a lot of issues that he did not want debated in Parliament? What is his purpose?
4. Why did he prorogue parliament twice?
5. Why does the PMO give speaking notes to elected members thereby stopping freedom of speech that the electorate depend upon and deserve?
6. Why did he not totally investigate the Robo calls affair but end it when a scapegoat was found?
7. Why does he not want to debate all proposed bills thoroughly?
8. Why does he not let elected members speak for those who elected them?
9. Why has he never talked about his membership in an extreme religious organization and how it influences his action
10. Why did he take the Chief Supreme Court Justice to task when she was doing her job?
11. Why did he make the electoral commissioner, whose duties are to investigate cheating in the electoral process, responsible to himself?
13 Why has he stopped a birth control program in Africa when the poor there do not have the means to support another child. This does not sound humane.
14. Why has he funded and supported the fossil fuel industry while stopping green energy since it is the fossil fuels that are causing the death rates over 400,000 per year?
15. When the Bible says , “Thou shalt not kill” why does he support fossil fuels that have now killed millions? This sounds Satanic.
16. He sold the Canadian Wheat Board to the Saudis against the wishes of farmers and gave the Saudi purchasing power. Will his religious community benefit?
17. Why has Harper given his Minister of Justice the power to review penalties levied by the Supreme court?
18. He has disallowed many the right to vote such as natives and those living abroad?
19. Why has he stopped funding science research projects that would be creating jobs for tomorrows youths? Science provides knowlede, provides freedom of speech , provides democracy.
20. Why has he financially starved the CBC to get rid of it while one CBC program “IDEAS” provides more intelligent diverse information than the whole offerings of most stations. Does he revel in ignorance? 23. Why has he made access to information so difficult to achieve?
24. Why does he not accept dissenting voices if we have freedom of speech?

In many ways Harper wields power like an Ayatollah with parallels to ISIS and Iran in his religious totalitarianism and reduced access to education. Will he grab power over education next and insist women are limited to certain kinds of knowledge?

Ask your elected members how they will cure this destruction of freedom of speech and democracy. WATCHDOGS should ensure senior people can be prosecuted for crime. Will they repeal Harper’s omnibus bills? Will they reverse the power of the minister of justice? Will they replace grants to science? Will they assure elected members can speak for those who elected them? Reverse changes to the office of the electoral commissioners office? Will they repeal the Harper omnibus bills? Ensure the repeal of Bill C51? Will they prevent dictatorship from being imposed again?
WHAT ARE YOU VOTING FOR?
Climatedisaster.com

BAD JUDGEMENT, RELIGIOUS EXTREMIST OR TRAITOR ?

Posted by Willard Anderson on August 17th, 2015.

BAD JUDGEMENT, FANATICIST OR TRAITOR 2015 Aug 16
FOLLOW THE MONEY AND WHERE IT CAME FROM
Costs and causes. What money is being set aside for special uses and where did it come from?
* cut the money to veterans programs
* cut grants to hundreds of science programs
* cut the post office budget
* cut the CBC budget
* electoral commissioner scope reduced
* cut military budget
All the while claiming that he is improving many of these prgarams. A strategy that says lie about what you are doing and you will fool the public who will think you are doing a good job, meanwhile work towards your own religious objectives meanwhile increasing the debt.

SO WHERE IS ALL THIS MONEY GOING?
Look to the omnibus bills and I believe one will find some of the answers. Examine the activities of the extremist evangelical organizations and there may be more answers.
Therefore the public needs to see what has been passed and hidden in Harpers omnibus bills.

The Liberal and NDP parties can cooperate to examine the Parliamentary Gazette and determine what was hidden in these omnibus bills that was not debated adequately and was hidden form the public. These hidden pieces need to be shown to the public. This may be the key to the election . Fortunately there is time to do this.

Examine the behavior of religious extremist groups and anti Canadian activity or traitorism and perhaps terrorism. Some groups erode from within. The behavior of Scientology recorded in documentaries demonstrates how this can happen.

When does behavior approach extremism or traitorism?
We are legally bound by our constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms , the Supreme Court decisions and the Governor General’s right to issue an election writ and to dissolve parliament.

DEMOCRATIC PROCESS REQUIRES RULE OF LAW

It seems most likely that Harper breaks the law of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

We know that Harper made the electoral commissioner responsible to the conservative minister so that conservatives could no longer be charged with illegal behavior during elections..

Found guilty of robo calls attempting to stop people from voting.

Stopped justice in the Mulroney/air bus affair by writing terms of reference for the commission of inquiry that disallowed the money in the paper bag (hundreds of thousands) from being associated with the airbus affair.

He made the Supreme Courts decisions susceptible to review by the conservative minister of justice so the supreme courts decisions can be overturned.
Appointing a badly biased judge provide the catalyst for this damaging process.

DAMAGED THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
Democratic Process is every citizen has the right to vote.

Place burden on natives and travelers to reduce their voting efforts.

Used fallacious mud raking in their adds to stop their opponents form winning meanwhile Dionne would have taken Canada forward instead of backward.

STOPPED FREEDOM OF SPEECH .
Scientists can no longer talk about their work or loose their grants.

Conservatives Members elected by the public no longer speak for the public but speak according to the notes from the PMO.

Elected remembers no longer represent the public voice but speak only for the PMO.

Stopped scientific grants and research which produces jobs for tomorrows young people. In opposition to Canada’s interests and needs.

ANTI CANADIAN POLICIES

Stopped scientific grants and research which produces jobs for tomorrows young people in opposition to Canada’s interests and needs.

Signed a free trade agreement with China that allows prosecution by China not reciprocated and causes loss of sovereignty.
Stopped a great deal (hundreds of science grants ) of scientific research that would provide jobs for tomorrows youth.

Strongly supports and subsidizes the fossil fuel industry at a time when fossil fuel use caused CO2 and climate warming thus killing millions. (UINEP 2010 Time APRIL, “250,000 die per year from climate change”). This is tantamount to death from terrorism but totally supported by this government.

Pearson started the Peace keeping military program for which he received a Nobel prize, but Harper has made our military an offensive force on his own . The USA UN diplomat stated that she thought Canada should be taking a peacemaking role, apparently suggested by Obama. Since everyone says these battles will not be won by the military but rather by negotiation, it seems this peacemaking role should be one Canada again pursues. There has to be a believable middleman. Harper’s strategy for using war as it redirects everyone’s thinking away from what Harper is really trying to do, and that is create a religious dictatorship. In fact one evangelical member said only evangelists should be allowed to hold seats in parliament. Harper is establishing a religious dictatorship much after the model of IRAN and ISIS. We must remember that the fossil fuel death rates are much higher than the ISIS death rates.

The Supreme Court and the Governor General have a duty to Canadians to ensure the Constitiution and Charter work. They may have to take severe action.

climatedisaster.com

Generation of Vipers killing the earth for our children

Posted by Willard Anderson on August 6th, 2015.

Glog 2015 Aug 2 A GENERATION OF VIPERS (A Review)
Those who do not take action to protect our children and grandchildren are truly
A GENERATION OF VIPERS.
Many glaciologists such as Julian Dowdeswell, head of the institute Cambridge glaciology and others are quoted for this article. They say: “the news from the ice desk is this; the prognosis for the future of arctic ice, and thus for human life on the planet, is grim” (p.49) Jason Box, Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center said , “he couldn’t live with himself if he didn’t do everything possible to transmit his understanding of abrupt climate change in the arctic and its dire consequences” (p 49) I would expect that teachers would feel the same. Even more so the media should be telling the whole story over and over again or they are not a free press.
“The last time atmospheric CO2 was this high , the sea level was seventy feet higher.” (p. 49).
And, “the highest temperature ever recorded in Greenland 80 degrees. July 20, 2013” (This and all quotes below p. 50). “It’s predicted that worldwide demand for water will exceed the supply by 40%”
Cary Fowler, “who helped found the Svalbard Global seed vault, predicts that there will be such dire changes in seasonality that food-growing will no longer align with
rainfall, and that we are not prepared for worsening drought.” “We are on a trajectory to awaken a runaway climate heating that will ravage global agricultural systems, leading to mass famine and conflict.” Jason Box.
“Vast methane plumes were discovered boiling up form the sea north of Russia” Koni Stefen, Dartmouth, and water vapor is now a serious green house gas.
“Long ago we exceeded the carrying capacity of the planet” and some religions still believe there should be no birth control. But “There are no rules for living on this planet, only consequences”. We have very little time to avert climate impacts that will ravage us irreversibly “ Jason Box.
Sociologists say our species succeeded because we worked cooperatively. Now is the time to work cooperatively to stop the use of fossil fuels, and turn to green energy.
Write petitions and distribute them on the social media and follow up. Ask lawyers to donate time to set up a class action suit as was done in the Netherlands to stop climate change. Press governments to impose high tariffs and to boycott countries not stopping oil production. Leaders acting on dogma with no evidence may have to be charged with crimes against humanity and the environment. Millions have now died from climate change. (UNEP., DANA Group. IPCC 5th report.) What action are you taking or are you part of the generation of vipers?
All quotes from Gretel Ehrlich, Rotten Ice, Harper’s Magazine , April 2015, p.41-50.

climatedisaster.com

Harper and dictatorship -how will you vote?

Posted by Willard Anderson on July 31st, 2015.

WHY DO WE DO WHAT WE DO? Everyone does things for a reason. Because they like the thing they are acting for. Perhaps for spite, for other emotional reasons, love, hate, for food and sustenance, for joy, or to achieve an end, that may be for mankind’s good or for personal reasons. In the case of our Prime Minister we have to ask , “Why did he do certain things?” You be the judge.

1. In t.he air bus affair in writing his terms of reference for an inquiry why did Harper separate or – why did he insist on not allowing the money in the paper bag from being associated with the air bus affair?
2. Why has he decided to kill medicare when the people want it? Why has he reduced federal financial support from 50% to 10%
3. Why has he prepared omnibus bills to hide a lot of issues that he did not want debated in Parliament? What is his purpose?
4. Why did he prorogue parliament twice?
5. Why does the PMO give speaking notes to elected members thereby stopping freedom of speech that the electorate depend upon and deserve?
6. Why did he not totally investigate the Robo calls affair but end it when a scapegoat was found?
7. Why does he not want to debate all proposed bills thoroughly?
8. Why does he not let elected members speak for those who elected them?
9. Why has he never talked about his membership in an extreme religious organization and how it influences his action
10. Why did he take the Chief Supreme Court Justice to task when she was doing her job?
11. Why did he make the electoral commissioner, whose duties are to investigate cheating in the electoral process, responsible to himself?
15. Why has he stopped a birth control program in Africa when the poor there do not have the means to support another child. This does not sound humane.
16. Why has he funded and supported the fossil fuel industry while stopping green energy since it is the fossil fuels that are causing the death rates over 400,000 per year?
17. When the Bible says , “Thou shalt not kill” why does he support fossil fuels that have now killed millions? This sounds Satanic.
18. Why has Harper given his Minister of Justice the power to review penalties of the supreme court?
19. Why has Harper made it more difficult for many to vote, such as natives and those living abroad?
20. Why has he stopped funding science research projects that would be creating jobs for tomorrows youths? Science provides knowledge, provides freedom of speech , provides democracy.
21. Why has he financially starved the CBC to get rid of it while one CBC program “IDEAS” provides more intelligent diverse information than the whole offerings of most stations. Does he revel in ignorance?
22. Why has he made access to information so difficult to achieve?
23. Why does he not accept dissenting voices if we have freedom of speech?

In many ways Harper wields power like an Ayatollah with parallels to ISIS and Iran in his religious
totalitarian ism and reduced access to education. Will he grab power over education next and insist women are limited to certain kinds of knowledge? Ask your elected members how they will cure this destruction of freedom of speech and democracy. Ensure senior people can be prosecuted for crime. Will they repeal Harper’s omnibus bills? Will they reverse the power of the minister of justice? Will they replace grants to science? Will they assure elected members can speak for those who elected them? Reverse changes to the office of the electoral commissioner office. Ensure the repeal of Bill C51? Will they cure democracy so this dictatorship cannot be imposed again? Climatedisaster.com

LEADERSHIP, CLIMATE , THE FUTURE 25 JULY 2015

Posted by Willard Anderson on July 25th, 2015.

LEADERSHIP HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL WELFARE

The pope says we must act against climate warming. Do people think the Pope is lying?
GIVE ME THE FACTS
Dalhousie University said a couple decades ago that there would be a collapse of global fisheries by 2050. As the trawlers roam the seas they wipe out one species after another and destroy bottom habitat and discard large volumes of unmarketable fish to die. Also climate warming is heating the oceans and fish species are moving north. Those animals at the northernmost limit have no where to go as their habitat changes.

Carbon dioxide has caused acidification of the oceans. This acidification and eutrification cause die off of millions of tons of zoo plankton – shell creatures and at their deaths they drop to the bottom to rot. Rotting or oxygenation takes oxygen and creates sulfide gases. These sulfides blew inland ( Climate Wars) killing off many species creating extinction periods in the past. Scientists have found through ice core drilling that there was a spike in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere before all five previous great extinctions. Ocean decay or eutrification is an important cause. This eutrification of the oceans is human kinds greatest threat. (Alana Mitchell and Callum Roberts) Currently we have the highest CO2 concentration in our atmosphere over 400 ppm, ( 1750 was about 270 ppm), this is turn causes ocean warming, acidification and eutrification.

Also there has been the slaughter of sharks in the millions. They are the predator of the jelly fish. In an acidifying, warming ocean there becomes a lower oxygen content
ocean where the jelly fish will become the dominant species because they requires less oxygen and thrived in the Precambrian seas.

Callum Roberts Ocean of Life and Alana Mitchell Seasick books described the near ecosystem turnover that the oceans are now experiencing. About June 25, 2015 ENN reported that there is a huge algae bloom in the north Pacific that now extends down the west coast, much worse than ever before, this is part of that eutrification process. Scientists also learned that the Indian ocean is now becoming warmer faster. The Pacific algae creates toxic chemicals that can endanger humans and is a contributor to ocean ecosystem turnover that Roberts and Mitchell fear so much.

Fossil fuel use has now created multiplier factors that speed warming and increases all these disasters. As ice and snow disappear more heat is absorbed by the oceans, Organic methane is melting out of the perma frost and methane is a greenhouse gas 20 times worse that carbon dioxide and will speed warming. Frozen crystallized methane is melting out of the perma frost adding to that problem. Fracking is causing the leaks of methane to the atmosphere. Doctor Smiletov in Russia has found methane leaks bubbling to surface in the arctic, some up to a kilometer long. More recently many of this size are reported to have been found. Also from research 500,000 old oil well sites have been found to be leaking methane in the USA.

Due to ocean heating now “El Nino produces more intense cyclones, heavier rains and warmer weather in much of S. American and E. Africa, and drier- than -average weather -sometimes droughts – in S.E. Asia and parts of Australia. … NOAA sees an 85% chance that they will last into 2016…. Drought in SE Asia would harm the crop there, and if El Nino causes the rainy season to last too long in S America, next years harvest could suffer.”

We are now experiencning climate driven drought- “with only 40% of normal rainfall—drought has parched pastures in Canada the worlds seventh largest exporter of cattle. Plants are running at 74% of capacity and with the fewest cattle since 1993.” (Jen Skerritt, Globe and Mail, 7 July, 2015 B7) This will of course drive prices up and may be a small harbinger of the NASA forecast of post 2050 mega droughts – food shortage!

In the future with crop losses from forcast droughts, tens or hundreds of millions per year could die.

There is now a further complication. Harper has said Canada’s economic problems stem from the problems in Europe, China and the USA. In Contrast The Globe and Mail 7 July 2015 B7, quotes Randall Bartlett TD bank who said “It is likely that Canada’s economy was in recession for the first half of the year… because of damage from the drop in crude oil prices.. the second half of the year is likely to be weaker than expected. …predicts the central bank will cut interest rates next week.” That is, a single industry economy relying on oil has destroyed jobs in Ontario and Quebec.
Paul Sankey of Wolfe research NY said, “There may be one last spike in oil price; but after that “the oil age is over”. (The economist 16 May 2015. p57) While his sequencing is probably correct the timing will drag a bit.
If the world is to benefit form the Dec.2015 Paris meeting on climate it should provide further incentives to move away form petroleum energy sources. Many countries are producing policies to go to green energy.

What to do. There have been a few cases of climate warming litigation. In Thunder Bay, Canada there was litigation against the city for not protecting citizens from the problems of climate change, in that case deluge and local flood. More important the Netherlands created a class action suit, and won, requiring government to reduce CO2 emission by 15% below 1990 levels.
All oil producing nations need to be held to account. Death rates are now too high 400,000 to 4 million (this unconfirmed) have been reported. The future for today’s youngest children is very dismal and this human die off is now out of control. We need a class action suit requiring oil companies to take 15% or more C02 out of the atmosphere each year, that is 15% more than they are putting into the atmosphere. This must become a legal requirement. Green energy production must be rapidly expanded.

If you are not afraid of this problem you should be. Ignorance and religious views are not an excuse. You have a responsibility.

Discussion of Context
Climate impacts everything.
The China cruise ship capsize was victim of the “heaviest spring rains in 40 years” says Bob Henson. It was stated that any event 40% beyond the long term norm is due to climate change. Of course statistics could verify what is caused by climate warming as it did for the cigarette trials. So there is a virtue in wanting to do better but it needs this broader view. Then it is possible that one time events have no basis for comparison but become significant when events build up. In the research highlighted in the documentary On Thin Ice research included drilling through the ice caps and measuring bubbles in the ice. These could be dated and showed that CO2 spiked in the atmosphere before the great extinctions. We now have a spike in CO2 at 400 ppm and heating oceans adding energy to climate events is increasing disasters.
Spoilers such as the oil companies can use a local event to distract people who don’t know how to measure. Weather accumulates as a product of climate. Increasingly weather out of synch with the last 2,000 years causes losses to humanity and the environment. The present leadership does not recognize this. They prefer to see climate as an act of God. MacKenzie King was another who depended on the supernatural, his Mother’s visions. The Huffington Post reported that Harper is a member of an extremist evangelical group. When one evaluates his actions it does seem that the religious goal is driving his actions. He believes climate warming is an act of god. But today we are all deeply committed to science; our houses, factories, manufacturing, transport, communication and food supplies. With the many measures of climate warming and the increasing death rate it would seem any denial is a satanic act. Now we should evaluate to see who would be or is the best leader material. Not our current oil company supporter. When we are being blunt as attack adds imply without evidence, it suggests it is good to get the whole story out. Earlier on climatediaster.com has described Harper’s actions.

As humans we are fully integrated with our earth environment. What we do day to day has little relevance without knowing how our actions relate to the biological and physical model that we all depend upon on this earth throughout our lives. Paying less for cheap oil today we may see as helpful, but if it causes extreme weather that kills earth’s grandchildren next year then it is not what we want. It doesn’t work with the earth model. The Harper focus on fossil fuels has brought our economy to the brink of earth’s recession. A more diverse economy and one producing green energy would decrease the death rate so long as we live within the earth’s capacity to support us. Now BP is forced to pay the USA government over $12 billion because of their oil spill. Green energy would decrease disasters and produce many more jobs and avoid climate warming. Are those supporting the fossils fuels industry complicit in the global death rate of over 770,000 deaths per year. What would logic tell us?

These connections may need to be managed in part through political processes but that is is an imperfect route to integrating human needs with what we know of the biological universe. We must study earth’s physical attributes and biological characteristics to know how our conventions can be safely applied for our lives and for our children. So far that has not being happening and the consequences are disastrous. Harper overturned all environmental protection statutes. There is now no control on destruction and our grandchildren will certainly suffer.

Theoretical beliefs most often have no relationship to the way the earth works. So unless we tune our wishes and philosophies with the way the world really worlds we may be doing damage. For example the Pope says that climate warming is the most important issue. Good for him. But without population controls and reducing demands upon earth there may be precious little success. Only when we understand the biology of the earth can we design human prescriptions for living a safe and happy life on earth. Much of what we do today flies in the face of there being no control on population pressures which is killing earth. We must stop using religious or economic models as being the only basis of our viewpoint. Without a viable earth those are just conventions for a very short space and time and often are very destructive. We must base leadersip on an experiential understanding of how the earth’s bio- physical models work.

When one views the actions of present leaders one discovers the weakness of the breadth of his view and his view does not contain the larger comprehensive model. The measure of an objective view requires the expansion of thinking to entertain whatever life broadly defined needs and limiting actions that unduly impact the earth. Almost all economic and religious models have this weaknesses.

Progressive Conservatives highlight what they see as negative losses to their idea of
the need for unlimited growth. But it is this unthinking demand for growth that is now killing earth’s grand children. The question is not only who is the best leader, but who is doing the greatest damage to the earth and our childrens’ futures. The problem we have is not recognizing the models of earth before we judge and propose actions.

Models for Living
We can report upon past actions, and context for needed actions. We say there are economic models, religious models, technological models, biological models
etc. We have to be certain there is a foundation and a strong element of reality before applying each. Economics is just a set of conventions. Technology is a set of tools that may be useful for any model.
Our parameters for actions should be real, not just a set of arbitrary conventions. For instance the human die off since 2010 has been reported by UNEP as 250,000 per year. (Time ,April 2010) a few months later the Dana group (insurers ) said 400,000. Then it was reported at 700,000 dead per year and lately over a million die (unconfirmed)
from climate warming every year. Certainly since the 1970′s millions have died from climate change.

Ideally we know that one cannot live entirely within one model or we revert to cave man status. They must be interwoven. They must be related to humans but it is simply that there is a level of interdependence within the biological model. The economic model of perpetual growth is not a model that supports biological life.

Economic model
So what we need to know is what does a model primarily rely upon. The model is the management of money and wealth. It relies on people believing in it. It simply needs people. But then the optimum situation is to make gains in ones wealth. Since that is the most important goal , the demand for this model is that it must require power. The problem it creates is one focuses more on wealth for fewer people as is happening today with global capitalism. In contrast the middle class or labor class become less and less well off, until most become impoverished, as we see is occurring globally today. But also the reigns of power come to reside increasingly within the hands of the well off. They control markets, they can use lawyers to have laws interpreted for their benefit as was the case in the “air bus”affair.

So as noted in the Economist one writer discussing economy said,”let the wisdom of the market manage it”. This of course is pure nonsense. Free trade has not proved to help people, rather it has begun the race to the bottom. Generally N. American salaries have
remained static but with many jobs lost.
The fundamentals for existence is not to succeed , not growth, but simply having a healthy life within the earth’s capability. We do not want only a model with this limited goal, but we can use some aspects of the economic model so long as it is firmly in tune with the bio physical limitations of the earth.

Religious Model
The religious model is perhaps the simplest. The goal surely must be through a priest caste to get into heaven in whatever a religion defines as it’s heaven. In most cases it seems to have a priest caste which delivers management of the rights to heaven for a price. You must behave according to its tenets. So this model requires power and control by a managing caste. Since the object is to get to heaven little else matters in the realm of the real earth. The fault here is that the real earth has limitations and demands of its own. If they are not followed the possibility of anyone going to heaven becomes more and more diminished over time. For instance the world suffers from over population. Beijing has apparently quadrupled in size in a decade. The impact of the city is so great that it has changed the local climate and/or weather. It is about 2 degrees warmer and drier than it was decades ago. Additional heat kills people and changes habitat. Bigness is only useful in a economic model that does not take into account peoples demands upon world resources. Unchecked populations without birth control are probably 50% responsible for fossil fuel energy demands that have pushed climate into a disastrous spiral of drought, heatwaves, storms and loss of food supplies and thus die off rates some say in the millions occur each year and are increasing. Fighting climate change also means fighting over populations and implementing birth control rapidly.

While we could say there are social models and perhaps many others, each contains a dilemma if approached exclusively. Mankind has no simplistic power or right over the
earth. We are seeing that now in the disaster caused by use of fossil fuels.

Bio Physical Model
There is however the final model. The bio-physical model of the earth. We can pretty much say the biological model and the physical models reign supreme. From fossil fuel use our present problem is that we now have over 400 parts per million of CO2, a green house gas in the atmosphere. Reducing emissions alone is not enough. We must reduce CO2 in the atmosphere to pre 1900 levels of 270 ppm. Returning the atmosphere back to the long term norm is the answer, that is removing CO2 from the atmosphereis the most important issue. To get there we need a strategy of punishment sand rewards. Litigation may be required for rogue states.

Everyone must take some action to reduce emissions. Noone can say , “I can’t do anything.” That is not true and doing nothing makes one responsible for the deaths of the grandchildren.

Good luck in your endeavours.

Climatedisaster.com

NASA weather models for your children

Posted by Willard Anderson on April 14th, 2015.

NASA inputted its weather data, and all 17 climate models agreed on outcomes 35 yrs ahead. This is your childrens’ and grand childrens’ life to come. If you care about the children best to take a look on line.

NASA Earth Observation Megadrought

Harper’s Policies will harm children – if you care act on climate

Posted by Willard Anderson on April 11th, 2015.

“PARLIAMENT CAN HARDLY BE WEAKENED ANY MORE THAN IT ALREADY IS. HARPER CAN’T GO MUCH FURTHER WITHOUT MAKING THE INSTITUTION DYSFUNCTIONAL. HE IS TRYING TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF HOUSE BUSINESS. IN FACT, IT WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED TO ITS FORMER STATE BY SOMEONE IF WE ARE TO HAVE A DEMOCRACY.” (HARRIS, One Man Party .P. 431.) Between loss of our democracy and climate warming government is very destructive. THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. We need to : 1. Know the difference between fact, belief and opinion and look to what are our probable heated futures. 2. Know that we depend totally upon the normal physical, biological and ecological natural laws that influence earth and we are victim of negative human influence. 3. Know that freedom of speech and democracy were once founding government precepts.
4. Know that when CSIS has more power the public has less freedom. Harper has given CSIS more power and implies that if peaceful demonstrators interfere with the fossil fuel industry which through climate warming is globally killing four million people a year (more than one million children), he will impose the full strength of the law and constrain one with out right of trial. 5. Know that the significance of computers is multiplying the speed of research and invention but also that they are only one of the macro influences upon earth. 6. Know that biological sciences have lagged. the human body was studied but the fundamental importance of biology in terms of the total earth populations and ecosystem sustainability was dismissed. It interfered with the business model. Harper sees no need for full understanding of the bio-physical laws of the earth since it does not apply to a theoretical belief system such as religions. 7. Know that carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released through burning fossil fules in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming and climate disasters. We recognized fossil fuel caused CO2 build up by 1900 and had better measures by 1957. CO2 emissions targets a decade or two ago was 350 ppm in order to maintain a liveable climate. We are now over 400 ppm! We need a change back to what the 1700 CO2 concentrations were and those targets need to be met in a decade. We can do it as we mobilized for the second world war in one year. Harper has turned on the extinction time bomb. We have little time to reverse climate warming. 8.Know there must be national and global action by the UN to implement serious jail penalties for: oil companies not implementing the pumping out of CO2 from the atmosphere and for not paying for oil to green energy replacement. They need to phase in closure of fossil fuel drilling, fracking and pumping. All wells must be tested for leakage and maintained and now methane releases in the high arctic require close monitoring. These are fossil fuel company costs. We must reward companies that recover CO2 from the atmosphere and produce mostly green energy 9. Know that the death rates from fossil fuels and success on these above endeavors must be posted on every big cities Times Square and posted on the net as well as noted on absolutely every weather forecast.
This is the new normal. Without it we die. The facts are in. Some deniers or religions may refute this but they are ignorant or may be Satanists. We should rapidly come to know them, and prosecute hate propaganda and those that deny climate warming. (The War on Science, March 2015)

B. THE DISHONORABLE MAN
The Canadian parliamentary system is adapted from English systems and traditions. Diefenbaker said: it was important to honor the precepts of the democratic system. Today we have: 1. The Senate as a chamber of sober second thought, but it has no honor. Parliament is the only democratic element but unable to honourably dispatch its duty. 2. A system based upon science and facts providing real knowledge and intelligent information, but Harper dishonourably constrains science and hides open debate. (One Man Party, Harris p.419-20) 3. The opportunity of the public to select and vote for a representative who has the responsibility to speak for his electorate honestly but is hindered by Harper and Parliament is, “almost unable to do the job people expect of it” (Harris p.421). Conservative Representatives it seems are provided speaking notes by Harper. Yet parties are not mentioned in the Constitution. 4. None of the processes can work without the element of free speech guaranteed in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and delivered inviolate by the peoples elected members, a free senate and the peoples media the CBC which under CRTC law must provide both sides of a story. Harper uses the CBC to spread scare tactics supporting his campaign while hiding the death rates and enormous costs caused by fossil fuels. 5. Henry the Eight based government upon the separation of church and state. Harper is changing this. 6. Canada had a very successful diplomatic service and foreign relations policies and that were central to our development as a peace loving nation. Harper has taken the opposite stand to Canadian diplomacy traditions encouraging war. This has incurred threats from ISIS, so he caused the fear he now uses on his electoral campaign. 7. We like all western democracies have had an excellent health, education and pension services. These are now in a state of erosion.

C. CHANGING THE STYLE AND FORMAT OF GOVERNMENT
To make serious changes to the format of government there would be the complete and honorable expectation that there would be a) pre election information of the plan and this would be followed by perhaps b) an election and at least c) the full and open debate in parliament and d) perhaps a plebiscite or referendum. To attempt to impose such a significant change without the above precepts would likely be considered in terms of the pre Harper Parliament be a subversive if not traitorous act. Certainly in time of war and Harper has said we are at war against terrorism. Terrorism can be in defined in different terms. Removing democracy is certainly one. All of these premises have been broken by PM Harper. One could according to the tradition of parliament say that none of the bills passed by Harper’s majority would have any validity in Canada’s pre Harper parliament, and consequently should be repealed. The other question is, “Is Harper guilty of undemocratic behavior?” He has imposed his words upon his members who have to speak according to Harper’s notes derailing the idea of independently voted in representatives of the people speaking for the wishes of the people that elected them. He closed down scientific studies and libraries while building a platform for unsubstantiated, mythological or self serving views to replace factual based judgment. There may be an omnibus bill that includes the right for the PM to make laws under a regulation perhaps like the USA. This relates to Harper’s desire to have a republic.

D. HARPER’S ACTIONS DEMONSTRATE WHAT HE WILL DO TO CANADA
1. FREE SPEECH He has taken free speech away from Canadians. The CBC is gagged. The PC members we elect to speak for us in Parliament are not allowed to speak unless it is from notes provided. Elected members were in principle elected to speak for their electorate not for their party.
2. AGRICULTURE Harper’s influence upon agriculture has been to close down the Canadian Wheat Board . This meant that farmers would have to make their own sales, generally get less for their wheat and become less productive. Only few large farmers near the US border would benefit. Harper has destroyed exactly that process and benefits from Canadian agriculture.
3. DEMOCRACY Is a method of government for the people, by the people, of the people. It has become, ‘of the people, by an unelected senate, and by a parliament not allowed to debate all issues of Bills and by an increasingly dictatorial prime minister.’
4. FOREIGN AFFAIRS Canada has had a long and highly respected foreign policy and encouraged peace keeping in Cyprus, the Balkans and other places. Our prestige came from not strongly siding with one party or the other in conflict but by being a reliable and highly appreciated peacekeeper and negotiator. We resisted nuclear weapons and were a middle size nation with no territorial ambitions. We had a budget to help the poorer countries in disasters and had a very desirable birth control program in Africa under CIDA. Virtually every country in the world is now over populated measured as by people caused collapse of ecosystems. Some measure population only in terms of market, others interpret a biblical approval to over populate – wrongly. The bible does not say over populate the earth until, you have destroy the earth.
Dr. Stephen Brown says (Party of One, p. 224) money from “CIDA is being used to have … Canadian tax payers underwrite costs of private Canadian companies doing all …the damage of consequences of mining abroad … [CIDA moneys] pay for their [companies] own misdeeds.” CIDA’s budget is used to pay private companies costs. But this was not debated in parliament. The highly respected diplomat Heinbecker says Harper’s “foreign policy shows inexperience, ignorance, incompetence and ideology.” Ideology is the worst.
Harper stands to be placed on the boards of many companies making himself rich at Canada’s expense. He has destroyed Canada’s reputation abroad. The other half of the pattern is again the influence of his extreme evangelistic beliefs that are not so unlike extremist Muslim beliefs. Death rates do not bother him. War to him is better than negotiation and peacekeeping.
5. EDUCATION Harper recently elaborated upon how a past government took money away from education to balance its books. This it seems to me is a warning that we can expect the reduction of funding for education to pay for the Iraq/Syrian and upcoming Ukrainian/Russian wars. Education asks questions about society, history, religion, biology, physics and all of the universe.
Education if not hindered by The War On Science (National Geographic) would clarify some extreme beliefs and false ideas that some want imposed on education. So Harper closes libraries. But the future of jobs and progress also depend upon that same education.
6. HEALTH The universal health system is always a priority of Canadians but Harper has, “washed his hand of the health system.” (Globe & Mail July 25, 2013. Picard. A 9). Harper has promised to remove billions from the health system in 2016. He will delay the election until then and we can expect the loss of medicare by 2016 in order to fight wars which are a NATO responsibility. He wants a private health system but the Roy Romanov report, past premier of Saskatchewan, showed a private system is at least 11% or more expensive and has poorer outcomes than public systems, never accurately disputed. The impact is war and religion trump health care. 7. PENSIONS Present pensions CPP and OAS are guaranteed payout pensions. Harper wants a guaranteed payment up front for the pension plan. That is the fund would be invested on the stock market and only the gains would be paid out. The losses would also reduce the pension fund and we may now be looking at a period of deflation. But the government can have a long term view, statisticians depend upon that to calculate expected growth. The individual cannot hire a statistician nor depend upon the long term view. He/She gets what one has today. Seniors would only get the gains made on the stock market but as well take the losses on a short term basis and would likely not do well. If there last working years occurred
in 2007-2009 many pensioners would starve when market returns were low or even negative. Individuals can not have the long view of governments.
8. ECONOMICS Harper due to poor management supporting only a single industry, fossil fuels which then created the Dutch effect (Selling oil raising the value of the dollar, increasing costs and reducing Canadian manufacturing.) and caused the loss of fifty thousand jobs in Ontario and Quebec. If economics is defined a s : income minus costs =profits, Harper has defined costs in a very narrow way including only: labor, materials, plant construction, marketing and transport of product. The real costs are more than ever now recognized to be huge and increasingly dangerous and include: acidification of the oceans, loss of wild populations, collapsing ecosystems, extinctions, pollution, death rates and climate warming projected to produce mega drought in the central and SW USA … and ultimately globally killing millions. Sorry climate warming is already killing millions. (4 m per year the Economist. Sept 20. p.24) Reports of death rates from mega droughts will be in the hundreds of millions and billions, since droughts by late in this century will likely be world wide. The mega drought has been tested by climate models and all models verify this mega drought. ( Burroughs, Climate Warming). This is the scientific projection if we do not take action.
Harper has withdrawn Canada from international climate agreements claiming they will cost too much while in reality the fossil fuel caused climate crises today costs $ trillions and is projected by the end of the century to cost equal to global GDP. He has caused Canada to be seen as “The idiot boy of the climate change crisis.” ( Party of One p 222).
Harper has not kept up and has a limited knowledge of todays economics. But his religion does not require it.
Harper has initiated Free Trade agreements with China for the sake of selling oil but in fact the net effect will be a lowering of salaries for Canadians. The European Free trade agreement has not been discussed and may again not be helpful to Canada.
Harper may sell wheat to Europe but now there will always be a food market, but Canada will lose out on sales of value added manufactured goods which is the future of Canada. He would hope to sell vast amounts of oil but this would bring about the end of life on our planet as we know it. (Hansen, Storms of My Grandchildren.)
An oil economy with the second largest fossil fuel resources in the world would produce climate warming beyond the tipping point causing ever higher human death rates finally to the billions. IS THIS A SATANIC
9. BANKING AND FINANCE CSBC bank supported and assisted the rich to evade taxes. This is an illegal act. Harper allowed the rich corporations to just return their due taxes and there would be no penalty. So the parallel is that one can rob a bank and if one gets caught, so long as one returns the money there will be no penalty. This is theft, the only difference is that some corporations are stealing from the largest bank in Canada, the people.
Second Harper never recovered the $one million of the peoples tax money from Mulroney even though he gained it upon lying in court. One might conclude it is OK to steal – risk is non existent.
10. WAR In the Iraq war Harper was one of the earliest to send aircraft to the Mideast. These aircraft were not requested and this is the opposite of Canada’s earlier highly respected foreign policy to try to be the negotiator and peacemaker. We had an excellent reputation as all todays wars ultimately require final negotiation (Kerry) and never just a military solution as was the case in the past.
Harper entered a fire fight first with aircraft and then on the ground in Iraq. He is now (While the USA and Germany are trying to negotiate peace.) lined up to be the first to send offensive weapons to Ukraine and to put soldiers on the ground as trainers, but of course we know that in the past these trainers were in active fire fights just like the aircraft. Putin now sees Canada as the enemy. In the meantime Canada has no protection in the Canadian Arctic and Putin has mobilized vast number of troops in the Russian Arctic. Putin has no qualms about attacking other countries and would place all the Balkan countries under his kleptocractic rule again if he is not stopped first by the Europeans and NATO. The Russians can beat the Ukraine and Canada with one hand tied behind its back. This decision of Harpers without all of Europe, NATO and the USA as allies is extremely foolhardy. It could justify Russia walking into the Canadian Arctic and controlling all of the arctic oil. Putin would love that. Canada has no arctic defense at all. But Harper thinks his action will help get him into Heaven. The USA may well not act in Ukraine because they want no complications with CUBA or perhaps do not want to be challenged in the arctic or have further problems in the Mideast.
As some journalists have alleged Harper’s motivation is he wishes to fight the Armageddon, the last battle between good and evil and in his mind assure himself a place in heaven.
Harper’s militaristic efforts defy any logic that would truly help Canada. Moneys for defense should first be for a military base in the Arctic. F35′s with little range are of no value there. His warmongering is not Christian in terms of turning the other cheek and is more likely a satanic response to a God’s good earth.
11. SCIENCE Harper has attacked science. He has shut down the internationally acclaimed Fresh Water Research Station near Kenora, Ontario and discarded books in the garbage. He has closed at least seven scientific libraries and wants to final edit all scientific reports to change conclusions as was attempted by Bush on climate reports in the USA. Scientists are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their grants and I have seen this at presentations.
At the same time Harper enjoys what science has produced: modern transport, manufactured goods, heated and cooled homes and commercial buildings. His stance is entirely hypocritical. In some ways it is similar to Pol Pots philosophy. On TV it appeared as if Harper had a hard time saying that people should get their children inoculated for measles. Death means to him an ascendance to heaven. Also with growing global population and consumption and increasingly extreme weather, all causing decline in species and ecosystems, our planet is less livable.
He has set the country back fifty years in Science. Stopped critical research. Has a religious view despises anything he thinks is not God given whereas science is not despised in Christian biblical terms.
12. INTEGRITY Harper plays with truth. (After This Everything Changes). Before being elected Harper promised to reform the Senate. Instead he loaded it with Conservatives and used it to vote down a critically important legal environmental bill passed by a democratic majority in Parliament.(Jan. 30, 2015. G and M). This act has has caused Canadians an unmeasurable sum. In the past practice the Senate would never vote down a bill past by parliament. Is he involved in miscreant behavior?
When Mulroney was caught with hundreds of thousands of dollars in a paper bag and the air bus possible bribery case was under way, Harper refused to have the investigative commission investigate both the air bus affair and the Mulroney hundreds of thousands of money in a paper bag at the same time. So Mulroney got off and won a million dollar award from the government. Then it was found that Mulroney lied in court and Harper made no effort to recover the peoples million dollars of tax money. Is this like letting tax evaders off without penalty?
During the robo calls affair the electoral commissioner, not beholding to the Conservatives, was responsible to investigate. It was discovered that the calls came from the Conservatives offices. The PC s were fined two fines each in the thousands of dollars. Basically this implies Conservative complicity though they denied guilt. But rather than correct this problem Harper has had the electoral commissioner placed under the Minister of Justice, assuring that the Conservative party can no longer be investigated by the electoral commissioner. The next election in Oct 2015 (probably will be delayed to 2016) could be the most crooked election if it is manipulated by Conservatives.
The RCMP has a strong public image and support. He has now placed more Canadian security investigation under the responsibility of CSIS, an agency controlled by a Conservative minister. This means that anyone can be arrested for any crime and held without trial under power that CSIS is allowed. The reason for arrest can be kept secret. Habeus Corpus is canceled. It means a police state.
He has not got a mandate from the public. The public was never informed of his plans. The past parliamentary elections were not based upon public notification of intentions. Is it democratic?
One can now question Harper’s honesty and integrity and whether his actions are in fact legal. Real investigations have been incomplete due to his interference. If the next election became crooked Harper would not allow the Conservatives to be investigate 13. RELIGION In general religions are not democratic nor do they always permit freedom of speech. When religions are responsible for governing they often become less tolerant; the Spanish Inquisition, the Thirty Years War, a conservative Turkey has allowed religious minorities to be persecuted. Totally religious based governments soon become intolerant. Simple things such as evolution and climate warming are not believed so that encourages ignorance. (National Geographic, March 2015) Some interpret holy books saying that people should not limit their reproduction and encourage more and more populating of the earth. But of greater concern is The Economist’s description March 7, 2015, p25., that some, “nuclear powers are more risk averse,” and there is “a wariness of leaders who feel their regimes to be… under threat… whose religion or ideology embraces apocalyptic confrontation” (Armageddon) as seems to be the case with ISIS and perhaps with Harper. That is such extremists would not hesitate to use nuclar weapons if they had them. Consequently Harper’s reckless involvement in Iraq and Ukraine, which now has cost one Canadian life and perhaps because it plays out internationally will cost much more, is a horrible idea. DID GOD WANT HIS EARTH DESTROYED?
D. THE OVERALL CONDITIONS FOR REMEDIATION
1.The independence of the electoral commissioner must be reinstated or if not could Harper be investigated for possible subversive behavior even though he is using Parliament and the Senate. These changes must be submitted to the electorate for decision.
2. Harper has , “pushed through omnibus bills ….with little or no debate.”… “AMENDED 60 LAWS, REPEALED 6, AND ADDED THREE MORE.” (Harris p.421.) Many without debate. It all omnibus bills should be repealed.
3. The Huffington Post has researched and shown Harper to be a member of an extremist evangelical group. Harper sees himself as the right hand of supreme religious righteousness. All his moves correlate with that. He feels he has religious right to do what he has done. Does this sound familiar? Is he is trying to set up a theocracy with himself as head and not responsible to any one – thus his fight with the supreme court. His approach is very much similar to that in Iran in form but his policies and actions on fossil fuels are incurring damages like Isis.
4. Harper is an extreme hypocrite and is dangerous to democracy. Extreme religion sees no benefit in science. Harper uses science based aircraft, cars, home heating and cooling, electronic communication but then has destroyed seven or more scientific libraries, closed the freshwater lakes research center east of Kenora (Party of One) and scientists are afraid to speak out or they could lose their grants. He has reduced grants to science and set back Canada by 50 years by destroying science programs. Research must be rebuilt.
5. He has strongly supported fossil fuels companies because he saw a great opportunity to gain financial support from them. If he is appointed to oil company boards after his term is up he will be remunerated handsomely. Media do not report the damages done by the fossil fuels companies because oil companies control profitable advertising and have shareholding controls. Many of the climate warming events have created terrible catastrophes. The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is the only one that has made a small incomplete effort to repair its damages. Otherwise the taxpayer is always on the hook for fossil fuel companies costs. The Philippine typhoon 10,000 dead, hurricane Sandy 57 dead and 50 billion dollars in costs, the European heat wave 2003, 30,000 dead, the Burma Hurricane Naga 138,000 dead. The IPCC Fifth study proved with 95% statistical accuracy that climate warming is a human caused event from burning fossil fuels and releasing carbon dioxide. In science 95% is basically absolute. The carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming. In part measures were taken on land and also ocean temperature increases shown by thermometers floating in the oceans and at depth. Dr. Stanford and others have shown how climate is modified. Greater evaporation and formation of rivers in the sky caused deluges of rain in Alberta floods killing a few for a total of 51 deaths from fossil fuels in Canada. The speeding up of ice cap melting has been measured by Dr. Barber U. of Manitoba. Other measures include, “Thinning of ice in central Arctic by 65% between 1975 and 2012. .. 36% reduction in thickness between 1975 and 2000.” (Arctic Cryosphere, University of Washington, ENN March 3, 2015). Fossil fuels burning must stop and CO2 re sequestered in wells not fracked.
6. DEATH RATES. The United Nations Environmental Program has stated that 250,000 die each year from climate change events. (Time, April 2010) the Dana Group says 400,000 die each year from climate change. More recently The Economist reported that four million die each year from fossil fuels, “Coal also kills a lot of people. Outdoor air pollution largely from coal though also from cars and other industry, kills four million people a year, more than any infectious disease, in so doing has huge economic effects”. These are facts from the Better Growth Better Climate report, ( written by 4 former presidents or PMs , 2 Nobel economics laureates, World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank). (The Economist, Sept. 20, 2014. P. 23-24) Harper has exclusively supported the fossil fuel companies. The true cost of gas USF is $6.25 pg and diesel $7.72 pg. (Drew Shindell, Duke U. ). About $2.00 per liter Canadian but likely all costs are not in. Harper with his unthinking total support of the fossil fuel companies has policies that seem complicit in these global death rates. Just as the Thorpe RCMP jailed the man that handed the gun to the man that killed the four RCMP officers, Harper has handed the means to the fossil uels companies. So we have it Harper exclusively supports the fossil fuel companies: Those companies are largely responsible (they mislead people about being green.) for climate warming. Climate warming causes disasters that kill about one million children each year but the bible says “suffer little children to come unto me.” Is there a satanic influence to these extremist views? One cannot contribute to killing children and claim one is a Christian.
We need to impose law for killing or complicit in the act and for reimbursing costs caused.
7. Law Harper has attacked the supreme court because it overruled him. He sees himself as the supreme decision maker. He has now redesigned criminal law, “CONSERVATIVES MOVE TO GIVE JURIES A SAY” This means juries can make a recommendation to the Judge but under this law, “ a marked departure from Canadian sentencing,“ .. “asking juries to answer specific questions” and …” provides a review by the public safety minister ….the minister may conduct the review on his own.“… “ who makes a recommendation to cabinet, which is responsible for the ultimate decision .” (the Globe and Mail, March 12 , 2015.) The sentence is the power over conviction.. The cabinet knows little about law and power is taken away form the judge who is the specialist in law, thus weakening our legal system but gives Harper the power via the control he has over his ministers in cabinet, which now appears absolute like a dictator. Thus seriously undermining our legal system. Politics overrides the legal system. This is hugely destructive. The senate and legal system are now controlled by the PM leaving no means to reign in the authority and dictatorship of one person, the PM. This dictatorship must be reversed. 8. Managing a Dictatorial Government This is the bandwagon Harper is on. His extreme religious views he thinks
makes it all right. Recently Harper has sent Canadian Aircraft to fight in a very real fire fight in Syria. In his view he is fighting Armageddon, the final battle of good over evil and will be rewarded with a go-to-heaven card. These aircraft were not requested and we would have been better of playing the peace card. All groups say this Syrian war will never be won militarily. But this increased military participation gets reaction from ISIS and now allows Harper to play his “fear mongering” card for election time. (Fear based leaflets have already come out of the Conservative offices in a voting district in Manitoba) and it will be used to justify and remove more rights from Canadians, now in process. Now since he has already ceded some investigation rights to CSIS, and recently given more power to CSIS to hold people longer, he is in fact giving himself more power. All is set to transform Canada into a republic. Much has been put on line about the so called benefits of a republic. It will actually be much less democratic. The next step will be to allow any group to donate any amount of money (A simple act in a majority government) to any party they wish. An evangelical Christian actually said only evangelicals should hold seats in Parliament. Since unlimited use of the media controls most peoples thinking Harper will have set himself up as permanent PM of a Theocracy managed by CSIS police soon under direction to become less tolerant. This must be reversed.

CONCLUSIONS
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.
He is ensured that he:
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
Lack of freedom of speech has gone a way too far. His huge changes were never on his proposed electoral agenda. If he has not acted in the best interests of Canadians what is he up to? Why is this man still here? He has disrespected all the covenants Diefenbaker held dear. His actions threaten Canadian democracy. He has seen to it that republicanism is favorably discussed on line especially for religious organizations. Totally religious governments usually become dictatorial.
I am afraid there is little time as Harper will use his majority in Parliament to turn Canada into a religious dictatorship run as a republic by an undemocratically appointed electoral college. Religious extremism
knows no bounds. Only Canadians can make this decision as we have freedom of speech. We need a referendum or plebiscite. The people own parliament.
Harper through controlling – elected members of parliament voices in Parliament, – the senate – as well as increasing security laws and – limiting our civil rights and – placing the Electoral Commissioner under his control, controls crime sentencing and has increasingly set us up for a dictatorial theocracy government.
I hope I am wrong but all the evidence points to Harper’s subversively undercutting the peoples choice of government. Is he a traitor to his own election promises?
Please pass this on and demonstrate May first before Harper makes more controlling laws. We need an on line plebiscite or referendum to ask what Canadian’s want. We have to remember Harper had no mandate to make such significant changes. Canada is not now a democracy. Just through Harper’s eyes.. We need a plebiscite or referendum. Harper had no public electoral support to make these changes.
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CHARTER WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH,THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMITTED AGAINST THESE RIGHTS. climatedisaster.com
References: The Huffington Post; The Party of One, Michael Harris; After this Everything Changes, Naomi Kline; Kill the Messengers, Mark Bourrie. National Geographic. Bouroughs Climate Warming., The Globe and Mail.
Referendum Yes No
1. PM Harper must resign _____ _____
2. All Harper omnibus bills should be repealed _____ _____
3. All Harper bills changing power controls in
government must be repealed _____ _____

HARPER AS DICTATOR
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.
Has a delay-deny-die policy towards veterans
PM Harper has ensured that he:
Controls the elected members of his party.
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Wants to change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
Will delay elections until he has control of access to Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
References: Eeric Gottardi Cdn Bar re “Violation of the Charter”: M. Bourrie Kill the Messengers: Harris One man Party : Kline “After This Everything Changes”. Quotes -Jonathan Kay “Biggest control freak Ottawa has ever known”. Farley Mowat “ S. Harper is probably the most dangerous human being elected to power in Canada.” L. Martin, “Harper is turning Canada into an anti-democracy.” Bob Rae, “I find Harper to be the most deeply partisan and divisive person in Canadian History.” A student of German history described Harper’s methods for taking over government as similar to Hitlers in his early days.
Under Harper we are no longer a democracy. climatedisaster.com
Your decision;
Harper should resign——- or Stay———-

Lack of freedom of speech has gone a way too far. His huge changes were never on his proposed electoral agenda. If he has not acted in the best interests of Canadians what is he up to? Why is this man still here? He has disrespected all the covenants Diefenbaker held dear. His actions threaten Canadian democracy. He has seen to it that republicanism is favorably discussed on line especially for religious organizations. Totally religious governments usually become dictatorial.
I am afraid there is little time as Harper will use his majority in Parliament to turn Canada into a religious dictatorship run as a republic by an undemocraticaly appointed electoral college as in the USA. Religious extremism
knows no bounds. Only Canadians can make this decision as we have freedom of speech. We need a referendum or plebiscite. The people own parliament.
Harper through controlling – elected members of parliament voices in Parliament, – the senate – as well as increasing security laws and – limiting our civil rights and – placing the Electoral Commissioner under his control, controls crime sentencing and has increasingly set us up for a dictatorial theocracy government.
I hope I am wrong but all the evidence points to Harper’s subversively undercutting the peoples choice of government. Is he a traitor to his own election promises?

————————–

Could you forward to as many delegates as possible.
The news on climate warming gets worse. On Line see “NASA Mega drought Earth Observation” Live model. Say by “ ten or more years of data
put through 17 climate models and all agree there will be by 2050 an 80% chance  of a 2 to 4 decade drought . (Of course much agriculture will fail).
 
The death rates are never spoken about. We go on for weeks about an abducted girl but fail to address climate catastrophes as an ongoing story getting worse each year.
- 2010 United Nations Environmental Program  says 250,000 die each year from fossil fuel caused climate warming. Time,April,2010 and IPCC 5th report
- 2010  Dana group (Insurance industry) says 400,000 die each year  from climate warming
- 2013 (I think) China reported 100,000 deaths in China (badly underestimated.)
- 2014 I saw a report  said 770,000 die each year (cant find reference)
- 2015 Better Growth Better Climate (written by  4 ex  presidents and prime ministers, Asian Development Bank,  2 Nobel laureate economists, World Bank, IMF and men form NY University and Princeton U.) States 4 million die per year from fossil fuels caused climate warming. Quoted in The Economist Sep 20,2014 p 23-4 and IPCC 5th report
 
Could you forward this to other delegates. It seems the whole truth about Harper is not getting out. One Man Party – Harris  and Kill the Messengers  – Mark Bourrie are very good but few have the time to read a whole book these days. 
We need a carbon tax here  as BC has. Cap and trade do not work, see article in Harper’s nine pages long. Also see on line : “NASA  Mega Drought earth Observation.” It states  “after using data  from 10 or more years and subjecting it to  17 climate models all agreed there would be an 80% chance there would be a mega drought of 2 to 4 decades long after 2050″ Imagine the loss of crops!
By 2050 an As the leader said  from Philipins  “Stop this insanity”
This needs to be dealt with or our grand children will suffer seriously.  I doubt politicians know the details.

————————– 
 
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices. He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.

  ——— —————
PM Harper has ensured that he:
Controls the elected members of his party.
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Wants to change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
References: Eeric Gottardi Cdn Bar re “Violation of the Charter”, Harris, One Man Party. Kline After This Everything Changes.
 

CHANGING GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS FOR DICTATORSHIP

Posted by Willard Anderson on April 4th, 2015.

Yes it has happened. He is now trying to override the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“PARLIAMENT CAN HARDLY BE WEAKENED ANY MORE THAN IT ALREADY IS. HARPER CAN’T GO MUCH FURTHER WITHOUT MAKING THE INSTITUTION DYSFUNCTIONAL. HE IS TRYING TO CONTROL EVERY ASPECT OF HOUSE BUSINESS. IN FACT, IT WILL HAVE TO BE RETURNED TO ITS FORMER STATE BY SOMEONE IF WE ARE TO HAVE A DEMOCRACY.” (HARRIS .P. 431.) Between loss of our democracy and climate warming government is very destructive. THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. We need to : 1. Know the difference between fact, belief and opinion and look to what are our probable heated futures. 2. Know that we depend totally upon the normal physical, biological and ecological natural laws that influence earth and we are victim of negative human influence. 3. Know that freedom of speech and democracy were once founding government precepts.
4. Know that when CSIS has more power the public has less freedom. Harper has given CSIS more power and implies that if peaceful demonstrators interfere with the fossil fuel industry which through climate warming is globally killing four million people a year (more than one million children), he will impose the full strength of the law and constrain one with out right of trial. 5. Know that the significance of computers is multiplying the speed of research and invention but also that they are only one of the macro influences upon earth. 6. Know that biological sciences have lagged. the human body was studied but the fundamental importance of biology in terms of the total earth populations and ecosystem sustainability was dismissed. It interfered with the business model. Harper sees no need for full understanding of the bio-physical laws of the earth since it does not apply to a theoretical belief system such as religions. 7. Know that carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released through burning fossil fuels in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming and climate disasters. We recognized fossil fuel caused CO2 build up by 1900 and had better measures by 1957. CO2 emissions targets a decade or two ago was 350 ppm in order to maintain a liveable climate. We are now over 400 ppm! We need a change back to what the 1700 CO2 concentrations were and those targets need to be met in a decade. We can do it as we mobilized for the second world war in one year. Harper has turned on the extinction time bomb. We have little time to reverse climate warming. 8.Know there must be national and global action by the UN to implement serious jail penalties for: oil companies not implementing the pumping out of CO2 from the atmosphere and for not paying for oil to green energy replacement. They need to phase in closure of fossil fuel drilling, fracking and pumping. All wells must be tested for leakage and maintained and now methane releases in the high arctic require close monitoring. These are fossil fuel company costs. We must reward companies that recover CO2 from the atmosphere and produce mostly green energy 9. Know that the death rates from fossil fuels and success on these above endeavors must be posted on every big cities Times Square and posted on the net as well as noted on absolutely every weather forecast.
This is the new normal. Without it we die. The facts are in. Some deniers or religions may refute this but they are ignorant or may be Satanists. We should rapidly come to know them, and prosecute hate propaganda and those that deny climate warming. (The War on Science, March 2015)

B. THE DISHONORABLE MAN
The Canadian parliamentary system is adapted from English systems and traditions. Diefenbaker said: it was important to honor the precepts of the democratic system. Today we have: 1. The Senate as a chamber of sober second thought, but it has no honor. Parliament is the only democratic element but unable to honourably dispatch its duty. 2. A system based upon science and facts providing real knowledge and intelligent information, but Harper dishonourably constrains science and hides open debate. (One Man Party, Harris p.419-20) 3. The opportunity of the public to select and vote for a representative who has the responsibility to speak for his electorate honestly but is hindered by Harper and Parliament is, “almost unable to do the job people expect of it” (Harris p.421). Conservative Representatives it seems are provided speaking notes by Harper. Yet parties are not mentioned in the Constitution. 4. None of the processes can work without the element of free speech guaranteed in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and delivered inviolate by the peoples elected members, a free senate and the peoples media the CBC which under CRTC law must provide both sides of a story. Harper uses the CBC to spread scare tactics supporting his campaign while hiding the death rates and enormous costs caused by fossil fuels. 5. Henry the Eight based government upon the separation of church and state. Harper is changing this. 6. Canada had a very successful diplomatic service and foreign relations policies and that were central to our development as a peace loving nation. Harper has taken the opposite stand to Canadian diplomacy traditions encouraging war. This has incurred threats from ISIS, so he caused the fear he now uses on his electoral campaign. 7. We like all western democracies have had an excellent health, education and pension services. These are now in a state of erosion.

C. CHANGING THE STYLE AND FORMAT OF GOVERNMENT
To make serious changes to the format of government there would be the complete and honorable expectation that there would be a) pre election information of the plan and this would be followed by perhaps b) an election and at least c) the full and open debate in parliament and d) perhaps a plebiscite or referendum. To attempt to impose such a significant change without the above precepts would likely be considered in terms of the pre Harper Parliament be a subversive if not traitorous act. Certainly in time of war and Harper has said we are at war against terrorism. Terrorism can be in defined in different terms. Removing democracy is certainly one. All of these premises have been broken by PM Harper. One could according to the tradition of parliament say that none of the bills passed by Harper’s majority would have any validity in Canada’s pre Harper parliament, and consequently should be repealed. The other question is, “Is Harper guilty of undemocratic behavior?” He has imposed his words upon his members who have to speak according to Harper’s notes derailing the idea of independently voted in representatives of the people speaking for the wishes of the people that elected them. He closed down scientific studies and libraries while building a platform for unsubstantiated, mythological or self serving views to replace factual based judgment. There may be an omnibus bill that includes the right for the PM to make laws under a regulation perhaps like the USA. This relates to Harper’s desire to have a republic.

D. HARPER’S ACTIONS DEMONSTRATE WHAT HE WILL DO TO CANADA
1. FREE SPEECH He has taken free speech away from Canadians. The CBC is gagged. The PC members we elect to speak for us in Parliament are not allowed to speak unless it is from notes provided. Elected members were in principle elected to speak for their electorate not for their party.
2. AGRICULTURE Harper’s influence upon agriculture has been to close down the Canadian Wheat Board . This meant that farmers would have to make their own sales, generally get less for their wheat and become less productive. Only few large farmers near the US border would benefit. Harper has destroyed exactly that process and benefits from Canadian agriculture.
3. DEMOCRACY Is a method of government for the people, by the people, of the people. It has become, ‘of the people, by an unelected senate, and by a parliament not allowed to debate all issues of Bills and by an increasingly dictatorial prime minister.’
4. FOREIGN AFFAIRS Canada has had a long and highly respected foreign policy and encouraged peace keeping in Cyprus, the Balkans and other places. Our prestige came from not strongly siding with one party or the other in conflict but by being a reliable and highly appreciated peacekeeper and negotiator. We resisted nuclear weapons and were a middle size nation with no territorial ambitions. We had a budget to help the poorer countries in disasters and had a very desirable birth control program in Africa under CIDA. Virtually every country in the world is now over populated measured as by people caused collapse of ecosystems. Some measure population only in terms of market, others interpret a biblical approval to over populate – wrongly. The bible does not say over populate the earth until, you have destroy the earth.
Dr. Stephen Brown says (Party of One, p. 224) money from “CIDA is being used to have … Canadian tax payers underwrite costs of private Canadian companies doing all …the damage of consequences of mining abroad … [CIDA moneys] pay for their [companies] own misdeeds.” CIDA’s budget is used to pay private companies costs. But this was not debated in parliament. The highly respected diplomat Heinbecker says Harper’s “foreign policy shows inexperience, ignorance, incompetence and ideology.” Ideology is the worst.
Harper stands to be placed on the boards of many companies making himself rich at Canada’s expense. He has destroyed Canada’s reputation abroad. The other half of the pattern is again the influence of his extreme evangelistic beliefs that are not so unlike extremist Muslim beliefs. Death rates do not bother him. War to him is better than negotiation and peacekeeping.
5. EDUCATION Harper recently elaborated upon how a past government took money away from education to balance its books. This it seems to me is a warning that we can expect the reduction of funding for education to pay for the Iraq/Syrian and upcoming Ukrainian/Russian wars. Education asks questions about society, history, religion, biology, physics and all of the universe.
Education if not hindered by The War On Science (National Geographic) would clarify some extreme beliefs and false ideas that some want imposed on education. So Harper closes libraries. But the future of jobs and progress also depend upon that same education.
6. HEALTH The universal health system is always a priority of Canadians but Harper has, “washed his hand of the health system.” (Globe & Mail July 25, 2013. Picard. A 9). Harper has promised to remove billions from the health system in 2016. He will delay the election until then and we can expect the loss of medicare by 2016 in order to fight wars which are a NATO responsibility. He wants a private health system but the Roy Romanov report, past premier of Saskatchewan, showed a private system is at least 11% or more expensive and has poorer outcomes than public systems, never accurately disputed. The impact is war and religion trump health care.
7. PENSIONS Present pensions CPP and OAS are guaranteed payout pensions. Harper wants a guaranteed payment up front for the pension plan. That is the fund would be invested on the stock market and only the gains would be paid out. The losses would also reduce the pension fund and we may now be looking at a period of deflation. But the government can have a long term view, statisticians depend upon that to calculate expected growth. The individual cannot hire a statistician nor depend upon the long term view. He/She gets what one has today. Seniors would only get the gains made on the stock market but as well take the losses on a short term basis and would likely not do well. If there last working years occurred
in 2007-2009 many pensioners would starve when market returns were low or even negative. Individuals can not have the long view of governments.
8. ECONOMICS Harper due to poor management supporting only a single industry, fossil fuels which then created the Dutch effect (Selling oil raising the value of the dollar, increasing costs and reducing Canadian manufacturing.) and caused the loss of fifty thousand jobs in Ontario and Quebec. If economics is defined a s : income minus costs =profits, Harper has defined costs in a very narrow way including only: labor, materials, plant construction, marketing and transport of product. The real costs are more than ever now recognized to be huge and increasingly dangerous and include: acidification of the oceans, loss of wild populations, collapsing ecosystems, extinctions, pollution, death rates and climate warming projected to produce mega drought in the central and SW USA … and ultimately globally killing millions. Sorry climate warming is already killing millions. (4 m per year the Economist. Sept 20. p.24) Reports of death rates from mega droughts will be in the hundreds of millions and billions, since droughts by late in this century will likely be world wide. The mega drought has been tested by climate models and all models verify this mega drought. ( Burroughs, Climate Warming). This is the scientific projection if we do not take action.
Harper has withdrawn Canada from international climate agreements claiming they will cost too much while in reality the fossil fuel caused climate crises today costs $ trillions and is projected by the end of the century to cost equal to global GDP. He has caused Canada to be seen as “The idiot boy of the climate change crisis.” ( Party of One p 222).
Harper has not kept up and has a limited knowledge of todays economics. But his religion does not require it.
Harper has initiated Free Trade agreements with China for the sake of selling oil but in fact the net effect will be a lowering of salaries for Canadians. The European Free trade agreement has not been discussed and may again not be helpful to Canada.
Harper may sell wheat to Europe but now there will always be a food market, but Canada will lose out on sales of value added manufactured goods which is the future of Canada. He would hope to sell vast amounts of oil but this would bring about the end of life on our planet as we know it. (Hansen, Storms of My Grandchildren.)
An oil economy with the second largest fossil fuel resources in the world would produce climate warming beyond the tipping point causing ever higher human death rates finally to the billions. IS THIS A SATANIC
9. BANKING AND FINANCE CSBC bank supported and assisted the rich to evade taxes. This is an illegal act. Harper allowed the rich corporations to just return their due taxes and there would be no penalty. So the parallel is that one can rob a bank and if one gets caught, so long as one returns the money there will be no penalty. This is theft, the only difference is that some corporations are stealing from the largest bank in Canada, the people.
Second Harper never recovered the $one million of the peoples tax money from Mulroney even though he gained it upon lying in court. One might conclude it is OK to steal – risk is non existent.
10. WAR In the Iraq war Harper was one of the earliest to send aircraft to the Mideast. These aircraft were not requested and this is the opposite of Canada’s earlier highly respected foreign policy to try to be the negotiator and peacemaker. We had an excellent reputation as all todays wars ultimately require final negotiation (Kerry) and never just a military solution as was the case in the past.
Harper entered a fire fight first with aircraft and then on the ground in Iraq. He is now (While the USA and Germany are trying to negotiate peace.) lined up to be the first to send offensive weapons to Ukraine and to put soldiers on the ground as trainers, but of course we know that in the past these trainers were in active fire fights just like the aircraft. Putin now sees Canada as the enemy. In the meantime Canada has no protection in the Canadian Arctic and Putin has mobilized vast number of troops in the Russian Arctic. Putin has no qualms about attacking other countries and would place all the Balkan countries under his kleptocractic rule again if he is not stopped first by the Europeans and NATO. The Russians can beat the Ukraine and Canada with one hand tied behind its back. This decision of Harpers without all of Europe, NATO and the USA as allies is extremely foolhardy. It could justify Russia walking into the Canadian Arctic and controlling all of the arctic oil. Putin would love that. Canada has no arctic defense at all. But Harper thinks his action will help get him into Heaven. The USA may well not act in Ukraine because they want no complications with CUBA or perhaps do not want to be challenged in the arctic or have further problems in the Mideast.
As some journalists have alleged Harper’s motivation is he wishes to fight the Armageddon, the last battle between good and evil and in his mind assure himself a place in heaven.
Harper’s militaristic efforts defy any logic that would truly help Canada. Moneys for defense should first be for a military base in the Arctic. F35′s with little range are of no value there. His warmongering is not Christian in terms of turning the other cheek and is more likely a satanic response to a God’s good earth.
11. SCIENCE Harper has attacked science. He has shut down the internationally acclaimed Fresh Water Research Station near Kenora, Ontario and discarded books in the garbage. He has closed at least seven scientific libraries and wants to final edit all scientific reports to change conclusions as was attempted by Bush on climate reports in the USA. Scientists are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their grants and I have seen this at presentations.
At the same time Harper enjoys what science has produced: modern transport, manufactured goods, heated and cooled homes and commercial buildings. His stance is entirely hypocritical. In some ways it is similar to Pol Pots philosophy. On TV it appeared as if Harper had a hard time saying that people should get their children inoculated for measles. Death means to him an ascendance to heaven. Also with growing global population and consumption and increasingly extreme weather, all causing decline in species and ecosystems, our planet is less liveable.
He has set the country back fifty years in Science. Stopped critical research. Has a religious view despises anything he thinks is not God given whereas science is not despised in Christian biblical terms.
12. INTEGRITY Harper plays with truth. (After This Everything Changes). Before being elected Harper promised to reform the Senate. Instead he loaded it with Conservatives and used it to vote down a critically important legal environmental bill passed by a democratic majority in Parliament.(Jan. 30, 2015. G and M). This act has has caused Canadians an unmeasurable sum. In the past practice the Senate would never vote down a bill past by parliament. Is he involved in miscreant behavior?
When Mulroney was caught with hundreds of thousands of dollars in a paper bag and the air bus possible bribery case was under way, Harper refused to have the investigative commission investigate both the air bus affair and the Mulroney hundreds of thousands of money in a paper bag at the same time. So Mulroney got off and won a million dollar award from the government. Then it was found that Mulroney lied in court and Harper made no effort to recover the peoples million dollars of tax money. Is this like letting tax evaders off without penalty?
During the robo calls affair the electoral commissioner, not beholding to the Conservatives, was responsible to investigate. It was discovered that the calls came from the Conservatives offices. The PC s were fined two fines each in the thousands of dollars. Basically this implies Conservative complicity though they denied guilt. But rather than correct this problem Harper has had the electoral commissioner placed under the Minister of Justice, assuring that the Conservative party can no longer be investigated by the electoral commissioner. The next election in Oct 2015 (probably will be delayed to 2016) could be the most crooked election if it is manipulated by Conservatives.
The RCMP has a strong public image and support. He has now placed more Canadian security investigation under the responsibility of CSIS, an agency controlled by a Conservative minister. This means that anyone can be arrested for any crime and held without trial under power that CSIS is allowed. The reason for arrest can be kept secret. Habeus Corpus is canceled. It means a police state.
He has not got a mandate from the public. The public was never informed of his plans. The past parliamentary elections were not based upon public notification of intentions. Is it democratic?
One can now question Harper’s honesty and integrity and whether his actions are in fact legal. Real investigations have been incomplete due to his interference. If the next election became crooked Harper would not allow the Conservatives to be investigate
13. RELIGION In general religions are not democratic nor do they always permit freedom of speech. When religions are responsible for governing they often become less tolerant; the Spanish Inquisition, the Thirty Years War, a conservative Turkey has allowed religious minorities to be persecuted. Totally religious based governments soon become intolerant. Simple things such as evolution and climate warming are not believed so that encourages ignorance. (National Geographic, March 2015) Some interpret holy books saying that people should not limit their reproduction and encourage more and more populating of the earth. But of greater concern is The Economist’s description March 7, 2015, p25., that some, “nuclear powers are more risk averse,” and there is “a wariness of leaders who feel their regimes to be… under threat… whose religion or ideology embraces apocalyptic confrontation” (Armageddon) as seems to be the case with ISIS and perhaps with Harper. That is such extremists would not hesitate to use nuclar weapons if they had them. Consequently Harper’s reckless involvement in Iraq and Ukraine, which now has cost one Canadian life and perhaps because it plays out internationally will cost much more, is a horrible idea. DID GOD WANT HIS EARTH DESTROYED?

D. THE OVERLALL CONDITIONS FOR REMEDIATION
1.The independence of the electoral commissioner must be reinstated or if not could Harper be investigated for possible subversive behavior even though he is using Parliament and the Senate. These changes must be submitted to the electorate for decision.
2. Harper has , “pushed through omnibus bills ….with little or no debate.”… “AMENDED 60 LAWS, REPEALED 6, AND ADDED THREE MORE.” (Harris p.421.) Many without deabte. It all omnibus bills should be repealed.
3. The Huffington Post has researched and shown Harper to be a member of an extremist evangelical group. Harper sees himself as the right hand of supreme religious righteousness. All his moves correlate with that. He feels he has religious right to do what he has done. Does this sound familiar? Is he is trying to set up a theocracy with himself as head and not responsible to any one – thus his fight with the supreme court. His approach is very much similar to that in Iran in form but his policies and actions on fossil fuels are incurring damages like Isis.
4. Harper is an extreme hypocrite and is dangerous to democracy. Extreme religion sees no benefit in science. Harper uses science based aircraft, cars, home heating and cooling, electronic communication but then has destroyed seven or more scientific libraries, closed the freshwater lakes research center east of Kenora (Party of One) and scientists are afraid to speak out or they could lose their grants. He has reduced grants to science and set back Canada by 50 years by destroying science programs. Research must be rebuilt.
5. He has strongly supported fossil fuels companies because he saw a great opportunity to gain financial support from them. If he is appointed to oil company boards after his term is up he will be remunerated handsomely. Media do not report the damages done by the fossil fuels companies because oil companies control profitable advertising and have shareholding controls. Many of the climate warming events have created terrible catastrophes. The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is the only one that has made a small incomplete effort to repair its damages. Otherwise the taxpayer is always on the hook for fossil fuel companies costs. The Philippine typhoon 10,000 dead, hurricane Sandy 57 dead and 50 billion dollars in costs, the European heat wave 2003, 30,000 dead, the Burma Hurricane Naga 138,000 dead. The IPCC Fifth study proved with 95% statistical accuracy that climate warming is a human caused event from burning fossil fuels and releasing carbon dioxide. In science 95% is basically absolute. The carbon dioxide was sequestered over a period of one hundred million years during the Carboniferous period and has been released in 200 years or 50,000 times faster than it was created by nature. This caused climate warming. In part measures were taken on land and also ocean temperature increases shown by thermometers floating in the oceans and at depth. Dr. Stanford and others have shown how climate is modified. Greater evaporation and formation of rivers in the sky caused deluges of rain in Alberta floods killing a few for a total of 51 deaths from fossil fuels in Canada. The speeding up of ice cap melting has been measured by Dr. Barber U. of Manitoba. Other measures include, “Thinning of ice in central Arctic by 65% between 1975 and 2012. .. 36% reduction in thickness between 1975 and 2000.” (Arctic Cryosphere, University of Washington, ENN March 3, 2015). Fossil fuels burning must stop and CO2 re sequestered in wells not fracked.
6. DEATH RATES. The United Nations Environmental Program has stated that 250,000 die each year from climate change events. (Time, April 2010) the Dana Group says 400,000 die each year from climate change. More recently The Economist reported that four million die each year from fossil fuels, “Coal also kills a lot of people. Outdoor air pollution largely from coal though also from cars and other industry, kills four million people a year, more than any infectious disease, in so doing has huge economic effects”. These are facts from the Better Growth Better Climate report, ( written by 4 former presidents or PMs , 2 Nobel economics laureates, World Bank, IMF and Asian Development Bank). (The Economist, Sept. 20, 2014. P. 23-24) Harper has exclusively supported the fossil fuel companies. The true cost of gas USF is $6.25 pg and diesel $7.72 pg. (Drew Shindell, Duke U. ). About $2.00 per liter Canadian but likely all costs are not in. Harper with his unthinking total support of the fossil fuel companies has policies that seem complicit in these global death rates. Just as the Thorpe RCMP jailed the man that handed the gun to the man that killed the four RCMP officers, Harper has handed the means to the fossil uels companies. So we have it Harper exclusively supports the fossil fuel companies: Those companies are largely responsible (they mislead people about being green.) for climate warming. Climate warming causes disasters that kill about one million children each year but the bible says “suffer little children to come unto me.” Is there a satanic influence to these extremist views? One cannot contribute to killing children and claim one is a Christian.
We need to impose law for killing or complicit in the act and for reimbursing costs caused.
7. Law Harper has attacked the supreme court because it overruled him. He sees himself as the supreme decision maker. He has now redesigned criminal law, “CONSERVATIVES MOVE TO GIVE JURIES A SAY” This means juries can make a recommendation to the Judge but under this law, “ a marked departure from Canadian sentencing,“ .. “asking juries to answer specific questions” and …” provides a review by the public safety minister ….the minister may conduct the review on his own.“… “ who makes a recommendation to cabinet, which is responsible for the ultimate decision .” (the Globe and Mail, March 12 , 2015.) The sentence is the power over conviction.. The cabinet knows little about law and power is taken away form the judge who is the specialist in law, thus weakening our legal system but gives Harper the power via the control he has over his ministers in cabinet, which now appears absolute like a dictator. Thus seriously undermining our legal system. Politics overrides the legal system. This is hugely destructive. The senate and legal system are now controlled by the PM leaving no means to reign in the authority and dictatorship of one person, the PM. This dictatorship must be reversed. 8. Managing a Dictatorial Government This is the bandwagon Harper is on. His extreme religious views he thinks
makes it all right. Recently Harper has sent Canadian Aircraft to fight in a very real fire fight in Syria. In his view he is fighting Armageddon, the final battle of good over evil and will be rewarded with a go-to-heaven card. These aircraft were not requested and we would have been better of playing the peace card. All groups say this Syrian war will never be won militarily. But this increased military participation gets reaction from ISIS and now allows Harper to play his “fear mongering” card for election time. (Fear based leaflets have already come out of the Conservative offices in a voting district in Manitoba) and it will be used to justify and remove more rights from Canadians, now in process. Now since he has already ceded some investigation rights to CSIS, and recently given more power to CSIS to hold people longer, he is in fact giving himself more power. All is set to transform Canada into a republic. Much has been put on line about the so called benefits of a republic. It will actually be much less democratic. The next step will be to allow any group to donate any amount of money (A simple act in a majority government) to any party they wish. An evangelical Christian actually said only evangelicals should hold seats in Parliament. Since unlimited use of the media controls most peoples thinking Harper will have set himself up as permanent PM of a Theocracy managed by CSIS police soon under direction to become less tolerant. This must be reversed.

CONCLUSIONS
The net effect of Harper’s actions have not been to help Canadians but:
Robo calls probably helped Conservatives win an election.
The Mulroney- air bus affair gave taxpayer’s money to Mulroney.
If Conservatives take illegal actions during the next election campaign Harper gave himself power to prevent an investigation.
His military support to Iraq and Ukraine polishes Harper’s view of Armageddon.
He will likely change government to a republic and give highest financial petro supporters ability to control government continuously.
He promised to withdraw billions from medicare to convert to private medical system which is more costly and has poorer outcomes.
He killed the Canadian wheat board that got good wheat prices for crops for the average farmer and now makes it harder to get good prices.
He probably gagged the CBC to disallow criticism stop discussion of the costs and death rates caused by the fossil fuel industry and paid for by tax payers.
He attempted to disenfranchise northerners who were not literate.
Changed some electoral districts to favour Conservatives.
He is ensured that he:
Controls parliament by majority.
Controls the senate by his appointments.
Controls electoral commissioner now responsible to his minister.
Controls the supreme court by his ministers controlling all penalties C51
Will appoint a once unqualified judge to Supreme Court to do his bidding.
Ensure that judge can overturn Charter of Rights and Freedoms C51
Allows CSIS arrest rights without charge and held in secret indefinitely. C51
Change Canada to an undemocratic form of republic theocracy.
Lack of freedom of speech has gone a way too far. His huge changes were never on his proposed electoral agenda. If he has not acted in the best interests of Canadians what is he up to? Why is this man still here? He has disrespected all the covenants Diefenbaker held dear. His actions threaten Canadian democracy. He has seen to it that republicanism is favorably discussed on line especially for religious organizations. Totally religious governments usually become dictatorial.
I am afraid there is little time as Harper will use his majority in Parliament to turn Canada into a religious dictatorship run as a republic by an undemocraticaly appointed electoral college. Religious extremism
knows no bounds. Only Canadians can make this decision as we have freedom of speech. We need a referendum or plebiscite. The people own parliament.
Harper through controlling – elected members of parliament voices in Parliament, – the senate – as well as increasing security laws and – limiting our civil rights and – placing the Electoral Commissioner under his control, controls crime sentencing and has increasingly set us up for a dictatorial theocracy government.
I hope I am wrong but all the evidence points to Harper’s subversively undercutting the peoples choice of government. Is he a traitor to his own election promises?
Please pass this on and demonstrate May first before Harper makes more controlling laws. We need an on line plebiscite or referendum to ask what Canadian’s want. We have to remember Harper had no mandate to make such significant changes. Canada is not now a democracy. Just through Harper’s eyes.. We need a plebiscite or referendum. Harper had no public electoral support to make these changes.
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CHARTER WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH,THE NEXT GOVERNMENT MUST INVESTIGATE WHAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED AGAINST THESE RIGHTS. climatedisaster.com
References: The Huffington Post; The Party of One, Michael Harris; After this Everything Changes, Naomi Kline; Kill the Messengers, Mark Bourrie. National Geographic. Bouroughs Climate Warming., The Globe and Mail.
Referendum Yes No
1. PM Harper must resign _____ _____
2. All Harper omnibus bills should be repealed _____ _____
3. All Harper bills changing power controls in
government must be repealed _____ _____

Receive Updates

About

Climate Disaster is a site dedicated to bringing up the ignored environmental issues that are affecting the planet.

Read more on the about page

Archives